top 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 132 points 3 months ago (1 child)
[–] 81 points 3 months ago (5 children)

“public domain” sounds naughty, too, though

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 77 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    The next time my best friend calls me a slut (fairly common occurrence), I'll be informing him that I am Public Domain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Stop shaming the rest of us for not knowing your kinks.

    Let us be vanilla as fuck in peace.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 3 months ago

    If not free use, why all the holes?

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    What is misleading about this. Someone spell it out for me.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 3 months ago

    anyways, freeuse is kinda what it says on the tin. "Free" to "use" the person wherever, whenever. if they're relaxig in bed, while they are doing the dishes, outside gardening the plants,, while asleep. Usually has some overlap with the ignoring kink where they try to just go about their day and pretend they aren't being railed ruthlessly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago

    It's still a silly question because who would even think SpongeBob would be close to public domain anyway. It's the lifetime of the creator plus 70 years. Were no where close to this ever happening and the only stuff we are even seeing now are crazy old.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    To know enough about copyright to be concerned about it using a character IP in your works but to know so little about it as to think maybe SpongeBob has entered the public domain by now is a very very narrow subsection of people.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    1999, it's been around for longer than a lot of people's lives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    Don't say 1999 like that is ancient. Also, there's only like 30 people that were alive when most things finally entering the public domain came out. If anyone over the age of 7 thinks that Steamboat Willie and SpongeBob are remotely comparable in age, they have no sense at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago

    I mean it only sounds nasty if you’re a fucking degen. But with that many holes, it’s still a question worth asking.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Is SpongeBob freeuse? Link him the MeatCanyon video. You know the one.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    He's got enough holes for everyone

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago*

    Is it misleading though? He didn't say what kind of movie it was going to be.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    AI slop. Look at the names

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    ugh fuck

    this exchange is so funny. i wanted to repost it to my mastodon instance. but i'm not reposting fucking AI slop. we have rules against that

    what the fuck was even the point of bothering to mangle this image in that way? how is feeding it through an LLM somehow EASIER than drawing black squares in MS paint? it didn't need censored in the first place! who the fuck cares!!!

    fuck! i fucking hate this shit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment