all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I really need to watch They Live

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Super cool use of lenticulars.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    The backlash says a lot about how people perceive always-on cameras.

  • source
  • 28 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 62 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Kylie Jenner ads at bus stops for google glass are some sci fi dystopia shit on their own. They Live was exactly about this.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    It's still boggles my mind that the foundation of the Kardashian/Jenner business empire is a (probably intentionally) leaked sex tape.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    Same here. Such a weird level of social "power" given to them without actual reason. At least the old capitalist families actually had functionally important capital control with oil, land, industrial production. The Kardashian/Jenner families are just famous and rich for being famous and rich. And they (and many others like them) have inspired so many people to aspire to get famous and rich via clout chasing instead of anything else. Becoming a plague of thinking they are smart about stuff just because of their follower count.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Wait fr? That's crazy
    I never understood why they were popular at all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    man i know some people with schizophrenia that would lose it after seeing that

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    /c/subvertising

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Anyone remember 'culture jamming'?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I, thought, the monsters in They Live were aliens, but I think they’re a metaphor for the parasitic wealth class.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I don't really know how popular that movie is with people who aren't into subvertising... I don't think it's very popular, I don't know if people will get the reference.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 28 comments in c/glasses@piefed.social view that post
    [–] [S] 38 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I'd say half the problem is that there are people buying these things. If you wear Facebook spyglasses, it says a lot about you.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

    I think I need to watch They Live, the meme pressure is too high!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You should definitely watch it if you haven't. Hell, even if you have it's worth a rewatch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    I highly recommend! It's a fantastic critique of unhinged capitalism and blind consumerism. Definitely one of John Carpenter's best. Slavoj Zizek did a splendid analysis of it that convinced me to watch it. Actually, I should give it a rewatch sometime.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Ok, if I had never heard of Facebook or Cuckerberg. And had never even thought of people using these types of glasses to perv with then I'd still know they were a bad thing because my one simple rule.

    The rule is that if a jenner or kartrashian advertise it, are involved with it at all, have invested in it, etc etc, then it's a very very bad thing (until proven otherwise).
    Shitty people advertise shitty things

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    American billionaires are the type who waste 215m over the course of 13 months 2024 presidential election attacking trans people instead of paying for universal healthcare.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    Glasses for perverts huh? My dad was considering glasses like this (not necessarily meta) to help with his macular degeneration. They can read out text in front of them, zoom and useful stuff like that for people with vision problems. But now he won't even consider it because he's worried he will be labelled a pervert if he is seen wearing them because apparently no one can conceive of a reason why smart glasses might be about more than spying. So he has chosen going slowly blind over having people shout at him in the street. I don't really blame him but I am sad for him that a viable aid is now so stigmatised he is afraid to use it.

    That said I do not trust Meta and fully expect them to use the devices for spying and harvesting data even if the wearer does not.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago

    if there were ones that were fully local and only activated their cameras when holding a button or something i think people would be fine with them. but what we get is spy-machines that send everything you see to marky-mark and his goons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    If you think those glasses can do those things, you have been fooled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    I'm not just talking about meta glasses. There are others more targeting vision impairment, but they have similar camera-in-glasses issues that attract the pervert label.

    The meta ones were recommended by the macular society, don't ask me why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    they can't zoom, there's no fucking display

    you know what can zoom and read out text? A phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago

    Jeez, why the aggression? I dislike meta too, but there are other products that have glasses mounted cameras that do offer zoom and text to speech for macular degeneration that he now won't consider because people react like you just did to the meta product .

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    Those people are saving your dad from:

    • wasting time and money because they don't work
    • possibly making his condition worse because they are not MD approved prescription glasses
    • being spied on and tracked
    • having his private medical info being sold off to advertisers, insurance, employers, government, etc who will use it against him
    • disappointment because they don't work
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Well all I can say is the macular society suggested them to him. We approached them about another product designed for vision impairment to find out if they had any experience and they said to try the meta glasses. We didn't, but I still think if there is a camera based solution that helps him, he now won't wear it because of the stigma.

    And for the record I'm not in need of any convincing to avoid meta.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -14 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    What the fuck is everyone going after meta for doing exactly what all of them are doing? Surveilling all of our lives. Are we really so stupid that we only care when it's a pair of glasses doing it FFS?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    So people shouldn't be upset about people buying glasses that help companies spy on people, because companies spy on people?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Lmao I had to give a very similar response to a genocide denier regarding Uyghurs in China 😅 for some reason a lot of people think that we shouldn't criticize "bad thing" because others are also doing or have done "bad thing". How fucking complacent can you get?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    There are dozens of us who are perfectly capable on focusing on more than one issue at a time. So no, we don't "only care when it's a pair of glasses", we care when it is a pair of glasses as well as all of the other things wrong with the world.

    It is not an "either/or" situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 2 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Man, it's actually quite concerning seeing the amount of people in the Y-Combinator comments who flat out do not give a shit about the horrific privacy implications of this device.

    Sure you might be comfortable with yourself using it out in the wild because you consider yourself sensible and trustworthy. You'd never use these glasses for any malfeasance.

    But not everyone is you. And I'm personally not that comfortable with the idea of some stranger going around with a concealed camera recording whatever they please.

    At least with a phone or action camera it's usually fairly obvious when someone is filming, and there's enough of a hurdle with "discreet" recording to prevent most perverts from doing it... But that's not the case with these glasses. Bleh.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Anything the Kar-crash-ians are involved with is a scam.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/london@feddit.uk view that post
    [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Watch the movie ‘they live’ which is where this is from

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment