There's no reason for this other than corruption.
Whatever reason Apple gives is bullshit. They can very much design a watch that allows the user to easily replace the battery.
There's no reason for this other than corruption.
Whatever reason Apple gives is bullshit. They can very much design a watch that allows the user to easily replace the battery.
Ah so making it harder for new companies to develop a product while exempting the biggest offenders. Great.
The law that exempts every device that it would apply to....
Gosh I hate the stranglehold corporate entities have over regulation. Example 3736281928372829177181833271537491613142
Honest question, does anyone actually think a user serviceable smart watch is a good idea?
...yes? I do. For... what I would have thought, up until a few seconds ago, were overwhelmingly obvious reasons including, but not limited to: reducing our dependence on major corporations whose only concern is maximising profit, respecting human dignity, reducing the amount of our ever-diminishing natural resources being squandered, saving a bit of money...
all 21 comments