all 57 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 75 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Something this article glosses over is the fact that Microsoft knew all of the web URLs he was visiting. I don't know if that's because he was dumb enough to sign into Edge with his Microsoft account or if they were collecting that a different way, but the GDID wouldn't have been nearly as useful without that info.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    IDK either. But so much is now like, ppl wanting privacy have to be right every time. The co's wanting our data, only once! A single hidden backdoor siphon to our data and we didn't protect ourself from it. A single telemetry that encodes every URL we visit. A single statistical way to fingerprint us.

    That Sisyphus dude knows our pain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    Which is why open source is important. Holes can be found and software telemetry can be avoided.

    A lot of the telemetry is sold to people as being in their benefit. Monitor installed software for updates, location data for weather etc.

    If the companies had to document the amount they collected in cash for each user based on ads and send it as a mk though report, it might be eye opening. The source if the cash would also be good. So did companies pay directly or dodgy intermediaries and data brokers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I don’t think Microsoft recorded the URLs, just activity from a GDID and IP address at particular timestamps. The authorities would also have subpoenaed records from other accounts they knew were his e.g. Snapchat and Facebook. The GDID was just a way of assigning activity from his device to particular VPN endpoints at particular times. The point of the story is essentially that the GDID allowed them to track his device across multiple IP addresses. But this wouldn’t have been possible without at least some other pieces of the puzzle such as knowing which was his Microsoft account, or Facebook account etc. in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 42 points 4 months ago (12 children)

    Year of the Linux desktop anyone?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Seems like the answer is never. The masses are too addicted to PC games to give it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It's not the PC games keeping people so much. Proton solved a lot of that problem. It's inertia.

    Most people don't care about things. They just don't. Their brains just don't have the juice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The bigger problem is that most people just aren't up for installing an OS themselves. I've certainly never had the chutzpah to replace Android, and I'm more tech savvy than most

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    100%. I think a lot about one of my friends when trying to think about that kind of user. Smart lady. Advanced degree. Has her life together. Would absolutely not want to try to install an OS. Wouldn't even know how to start.

    But I'm confident if I handed her a Linux laptop, she'd use it just the same as a Mac or Windows machine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    I agree. But I think more to the other side of it. I worry that a vast influx, who don't care about privacy and computing freedom, would make for huge market pressure to lock down Linux. Same way we see Windows, IOS, Android locked.

    Game co's, big tech, and others will demand it, if the masses flee to Linux. Today, most Linux users go nah, we want freedom more than your AAA game. If that changes, we could lose the very culture that resists locked down corporate controlled computing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Gaming hasn't been an issue for years

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago*

    There are certain games that refuse to enable anticheat on Linux. So if you play one of those games, you’re forced to use Windows. But that isn’t Linux’s fault. It’s simply the game makers refusing to enable Linux support. Multiple game devs have even stated that it’s basically an “enable on Linux” checkbox on their end, but the publishers want that sweet kernel-level access on Windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I have tried over and over for 30 years now and every time I discover something is missing, something I’m not willing to give up. Today it was Google Drive. There are multiple solutions for Linux to mount Google Drive as a folder in the local filtersystem, none of them offer decent performance compared to the windows client. Every time I try Linux something like this comes up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    could you elaborate on what you mean by "performance" of cloud storage? the speed of upload, download?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago*

    The time it takes to open and list a directory using Nautilus in GNOME desktop. It can take 5-10 seconds with a directory of 5 files, a lot longer if there are 50 files in a directory. And all the "solutions" I find on the web involve some kind of guesswork and tweaking settings left and right, hoping to somehow hit a magic combination that works.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago

    The complaint quotes a Microsoft representative describing the GDID as “a persistent, device-level identifier designed to uniquely identify an installation of a Windows operating system on a device, either a physical device (e.g., a mobile phone or laptop) or virtual machine, across certain Microsoft services and scenarios”

    A Global Device ID (GDID) is a permanent, unique digital fingerprint that Microsoft automatically assigns to your computer when you install Windows or sign into a Microsoft account.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] [S] 45 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    Imagine your computer has a secret ID number that Microsoft gives it when you sign in with your Microsoft account. This number is like a permanent nametag that your computer wears. Even if you use a VPN to hide your location, that nametag stays the same.

    A hacker used a VPN to hide while breaking into a jewelry store's computer system. But Microsoft helped the FBI find him because his computer's secret nametag kept showing up everywhere he went online. They matched that nametag to his social media accounts and other stuff he did, and that's how they caught him. Most people didn't even know this secret nametag existed, and you can't turn it off without breaking your computer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    the average lemmy user is much more tech literate than an average person

    people really don't know that kind of stuff. to many a computer is a computer, it has internet, and plays games... what's an operating system?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago*

    People cant figure out how to connect their idiotic tv (marketed as smart tv) to the streaming box

    And others cant figure out how to turn the ac to cold and are "afraid of breaking it" bruh its a ac, the worst you can do is set a timer

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Thanks! He should have used Linux

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    Don't forget the unique identifier of Edge and Chrome.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    Then there’s activation. Massgrave, the group behind Microsoft Activation Scripts, notes that Windows setup sends hardware info to Microsoft and gets identifiers back, the same tokens later used for Store access and licensing: “It’s impossible to prevent Windows from getting a GDID without breaking activation and UWP app[s].” Anyone who lost a license after swapping a motherboard has already met a smaller version of this.

    I guess this is why people always said it was impossible to remove the watermark that appears when you are not activated, when it was rolled out many years ago.

    Defeating the reasons for activation might've lead the more tech-savvy to figuring out the nature of the identifiers being sent for activation and seeing where else they are sent.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    why would a hacker use windows?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    the fucked up thing is this GDID thing apparently also show up for VM. So that would mean any VM and even a Quebe?

    Fuck microsoft

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Hacker

    Uses windows

    He got what he fucking deserved

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Okay, buy the thing to take note here is what tech companies can hide.

    You know they're tracking users but there are still things we'll never find out unless they reveal it themselves or are made to reveal in indirectly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Does MS track what you do in Edge and Windows, yes. Does Google track you in Crome and any app of theirs, yes. Does Apple track everything you do on their devices, yes. Does meta, twitter, all social media sites track the fuck out of you, also yes.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Does Linux track you? Does LibreWolf track you? Does GrapheneOS track you? Does Vanadium track you? Does SimpleX or Signal track you? Does...

    Never mind, I think you get my point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    This sounds so much like the snitch code from Thieves' Emporium by Max Hernandez, written in 2014.

    Or at least I believe it was 2014.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    We thought china was better

  • source
  • 201 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    37 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    9 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    9 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    7 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ca view that post
    2 comments in c/windows11@lemmy.world view that post