Wireless hardware to seriously disrupt rail transport costs less than $500.

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 1 year ago*

Soooo many safety concerns exist in unimaginable situations only because just a handful of people are aware of them.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    This is why its important to have things out in the open. You can't get away with the "nobody knows" excuse like you can with proprietary software.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Wait, WHO LET TRAINS INTO THIS COUNTRY WITH NO BRAKES!

    Those are dangerous murderers!

    Deport those trains immediately!

    thunderous ughhhhh

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Liquidate the operators. Nationalise now.

  • source
  • 5 comments in c/cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works view that post
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Operators is in the title and then never again in the article.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I had a vendor tell me their new wireless device doesn't need a password because it's proprietary and they'd need the hardware and software from said vendor. Hardware and software that literally anyone can buy from their website. My company bought them anyway. FML.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    That's just so typical that the AAR is refusing to take any action to correct something except when absolutely forced to

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/cybersecurity@infosec.pub view that post
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    The big railroads are laser focused on short term profits these days, to the detriment of long-term investment and public safety. A fix would probably require updating or replacing the Head of Train transceiver on every locomotive, and that’s not good for quarterly dividends.

  • source