all 53 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 92 points 4 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 32 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This one really pisses me off.

    The guy brought in a printout of the controlling fifth circuit opinion that was directly applicable to him, and the prison guards literally threw the court order in the trash before trashing his constitutional rights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Well, he chose the wrong religion to have any religious freedom.

    The Nat-C's think that religious freedom just means choosing the "right" denomination of xtianity and definitely don't believe in actual religious freedom which would require a separation of church and state, which they absolutely deny.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I guess some religions are more equal than others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago*

    Yes, absolutely what the Seven Mountain Mandate Nat-C's want. You have the "religious freedom" to "choose" between a narrow set of xtian sects.

    Everything else is suspect and anyone choosing something else is to be treated like second class citizens, if not outright persecuted.

    People in the "right" xtians sects are to be granted unwarranted privilege and and put on pedestals, as it was before.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 60 points 4 months ago* (6 children)

    Good, there's no stronger driver of atheism than being forced to read boring canaanite fan fiction.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    They are also changing the social studies program to promote christian nationalism while promoting islamphobia so no farthest from good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    You can help by reporting any religious drivel that appears in your feed.

    Harmful or misleading content

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    You think reporting posts on social media is going to do anything at this point?

    The billionaires are on board with this plan and are actively helping.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Add it to the huge and ever-growing pile of "reasons to not live in Texas". Hopefully Texans have enough of this bullshit and kick out the clowns responsible for this. But given how voters are being disenfranchised in many parts of the country, that's very unlikely.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    Doesn’t the first clause of the first amendment say the government shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion?

    I guess Texas can’t read.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The Supreme Court has already ruled against this. The point is to let this corrupt court reverse that ruling.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 4 months ago

    Can parents exempt their children from this? Because they already let them avoid sex education and anything that might not be hetero.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    The American Taliban

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago

    Ya’ll Queda strikes again

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago

    On the plus side, forcing middle-schoolers to actually read the Bible is a great way to get them to hate it. The Bible is... not exactly an enjoyable reading experience, and that's coming from someone who loves to read. You think this is going to be anything but torture for today's TikTok-brain kids?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    Good. Kids should know things like Ezekiel 23:20

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    "There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses."

    I'm sure these kids are destined to come across horsecock porn if they haven't already.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Bold of you to assume America's public school students are still capable of reading.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Teacher should make a whole thing of teaching them the original languages of each passage, and also the Latin Vulgate so they'll get something useful out of it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Not gonna lie if I had the opportunity to learn Hebrew, Koine Greek, Aramaic and Latin in school that would have been amazing. Where I live, it was only Spanish

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Latin and Ancient Greek were fun for a cumulated 3 minutes before I realised how unrelated those are to any of young-me interests. And it was a 2 or 3 years ride…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    What about old you? I've always thought reading the classics in their mother tongue would be great!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Sure. I learned english largely to be able to read OG Pratchet & Tolkien. Old Greek & Latin I have actually zero interest into most of it. Maybe if that's your thing it would be great but in that case nothing it preventing you to learn old language whenever. Young-me had no choice - those were mandatory at school.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    It's okay I'm sure they'll focus on the passage about the rich getting into heaven as likely as a camel going through a needles eye and all that chasing money changers from the temple

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    They did the specifically to get sued. Then they can claim their being attacked by the left/woke/lgbt/athiest/satinist/bogeyman and make a bunch of noise when (if but probably when) it's ruled unconstitutional. It's become their MO; do something blatantly illegal, then kick and scream like a toddler because you forced everybody else to sue to strike it down. The assholes get to brag that they did something to protect religious freedom, or cultural values, or family protection, or some such shit, and then they get to make a lot of noise in the press when they get knocked on their ass for it. Then while the people who actually care about the law are busy fighting that they can repeat the process two or three more times. It's sisyphian bullshit and I hate it.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Isn't Mythology required reading in many states? How is this different? (ducks)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    But the ones pushing the law didn't read the bible.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Reading doesn't mean understanding. If I had children in Texas, I'd encourage them to ask questions over and over.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Oh thank goodness! I was worried about xtian belief falling off a cliff the past several decades.

    Now we can get the government to compel an underage captive audience to read from "the" bible and hopefully compel them to convert!

    -- xtianists

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    The Church of Satan should disseminate reading material as well.

  • source
  • 57 comments in c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world view that post
    27 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
    3 comments in c/politics@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post