you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I wonder how much of the facilities boom came from the economic growth of the 50s, and 60s. Every city I've lived in has a few facilities named "Centennial" that were built in 1967. They're still in use.

Meanwhile, the 25 year old cut-off used in the article kinda corresponds to the austerity of the 1990s. The facilities I've seen built since then (in Ottawa, at least) seem to be municipally required largesse from developers.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Regardless, it’s the fault of the politicians for not earmarking enough money for repairs and maintenance. It’s not like this should be unexpected costs, and if they’re still used, where’s the maintenance slush fund?

    It would be like letting lrt tracks to degrade. Just shameful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It's another consequence of the out of control construction inflation over the last half century. Compare the various construction price index to the consumer price index - we simply cannot build things affordably anymore.

  • source
  • parent