Ofc they do. But the specifier matters.

For instance, would you disagree that the "therapist" part of the title seems a tad less important when there's something like "orgone" preceding it? Changes the nature, the credibility of what comes after it, no?

I'm not saying medical doctors are into pseudoscience, but we are joking about how badly trained and seemingly unintelligent some of them are. And pointing out "general practitioner" also shows that the doctor didn't specialise, which sometimes is because of lack of ability.

In Finnish a health clinic is "terveyskeskus", "health centre", but a lot of people have come to call them "arvauskeskus" ~ "guessing centre".

The people who actually excel at med schools rarely get stuck at that level and most of the doctors there are like late 20's without experience or specialisation and the "intellectual rigour" they put into their work is... unimpressive, at best.

It's more like they're using a flow chart for every single thing and can't understand a word you're saying.

Bang on. Grifters go around finding someone who will agree with their grift. They didn't ask any doctor, they asked one who would agree with them.

Absolutely. Universities went from institution that's taught you how to think outside the box to a place that teaches you how to fill positions at a lab/office/whatever. They don't want you inventing the future, they want you filling their prescriptions or fixing their phones. It might lead into the old adage that those who don't know how to do, teach? I don't buy that, but still...