Those are leninist/Maoist. If we're being generous we could call them aspirationally communist. But not actually communist.

2 defining criteria for communism is being stateless. Ie not having an governing state elected or otherwise. Definitely not having a large hierarchical unanswerable centralized government. And the other being classlessness. Something that the large central politburos preclude.

The one thing Leninism shares in the most asinine and negative way with communism. In the actual vision of communism, Marx and others theorized that the workers of the factory, etc. Should own the factory. Social ownership. However, Leninism warps and twists it negatively in that the state owns everything, not the workers. They may claim that the workers are the state. But that's bullshit as can easily be seen by any time they put down a citizen revolt. Roll out the tanks, etc. Like Tiananmen Square.

I am not sure. I've never given it a concrete thought. Communism as a whole is very nebulous. I particularly like the socialist aspects and the welfare for all goals of communism. I like the dream of not having to work to survive.

But I do not like the planned economy aspect of it. I haven't seen anyone do planned economies well. This includes non communist countries that tried it. There's something to say about how it is impossible to create a complex web of plans that accurately and adequately account for humanity's ever-changing needs and wants. But economics is fairly complex and I have little authority over the subject matter to say anything with confidence.

Basically - Freemarket, multi-socialist-only party system, with four strong pillars of democracy acting as checks and balances, with welfare for all.

I don't identify as a communist in the conventional sense or any other particular label per say. But I do lean left.

so like, whilst I don't like Tankies AT ALL (they all demand your read a specific 1000 book list before even having a discussion)... I do think anti-communists are also annoying and often under cooked/biased on historical facts.

I agree.

..Vietnam also has a system of Market Socialism, they've just almost resolved homelessness and have no housing crisis because they have a land redistribution system for anyone who wants to go into farming.

Always assumed they did what china did. They realized that the tool to stay in power was stability and growth, so they incentivized development on the local and national level for climbing the party ladder and good boy points. But it's nice to see them actually follow through with the ideals as well.

In short - in comes across as reactionary (rather than thoughtful/legitmate).

I understand how that can be tiring. I've stopped talking to anyone who purports any fascist or anti-socialist ideals. They will never listen. They are too comfortable with the power they hold to reconsider. On lemmy, I have come across far too many tankies who confuse me to no end. They come off as religious nuts who pretend to like the same ideals I do. They are in my opinion just as worse as the anti-communists.

I don't want to be associated with them. And I think the political spectrum is far too complicated to neatly divide people into simple categories. But it's easier to do and who has the time to actually get to know strangers online. So, as a rule, I am against any tankie or fascist.