you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

There is no possible way the majority of the money is going into the game. It's simply not plausible.

And moreover both things can be true, it can be a scam where the leadership is pocketing most of the money and also a decent game locked in production forever simply to make more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

    So here's what I don't get... CIG is a notoriously mismanaged company running an incredibly bloated game that has been feature-creeped beyond all recognition from its original pitch, run by a self-important auteur egomaniac who frequently costs the company time (and therefore money) by exercising a truly obsessive level of control over every single aspect of the game's development...

    ... And they're also so shockingly good at everything they do, so efficient, so clever and smart that they can spend 13 years very publicly producing a ridiculously high concept, broadly scoped, overly ambitious money pit of an MMO, whilst actually secretly siphoning off the majority of the money they've received into their own personal accounts. They are, in fact, so good at this that they can make a game bigger and more complex than GTA 6, on the same kind of budget, whilst actually needing to only spend a fraction of that budget on the actual game development, and they're so good in fact that they can do all of that whilst convincingly running the pretense of being a shockingly mismanaged company.

    Do I have that right?

    Look, I get the urge to turn everything into a conspiracy, but bro, it ain't that deep. They're just a bunch of nerds with bad people skills and a lot of money to burn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

    Correct.

    14 years of development does not imply good or efficient. There's no secret about it, keeping it on permanent development gives them a job for as long as they can keep the grift going. You're implying everyone thinks the game is good, worthwhile or innovative, I do not agree on most of those points. That said again both things can be true.

    No, you've added your opinion and tried to pass it off as objective fact.

    It doesn't need to be that deep, it's just fraud with a fan base which could be said of a lot of games just none this expensive or developed as long.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

    14 years of development does not imply good or efficient.

    Where did I say that?

    You're implying everyone thinks the game is good, worthwhile or innovative

    Again, where did I say that?

    I'm honestly wondering if you replied to the wrong comment by mistake, because I can't see how you got any of that from what I said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 13 hours ago* (2 children)

    Literally "good at everything they do" aside from stick to a release date obviously.

    All you had to do was look for the word good in your comment boss.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    You mean the paragraph that was very clearly written as sarcasm to highlight the inherent contradiction in your theory? Would that be the part you're referring to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 12 hours ago

    I do not think any of those things therefore they weren't in my argument, that's your argument at that point. It's a red herring you wrote yourself, it is odd you're confused by it though.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)