38
$100K penalty against X for not deleting intimate image reversed (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 5 days ago by to c/canada@lemmy.ca
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Tribunal vice-chair Eric Regehr said in the latest decision that he was reversing the fine, and that X had a valid defence under a section of the intimate images law that states an internet company is not liable if it "has taken reasonable steps to address the unlawful distribution."

What a motherfucker

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 day ago

Since our government and Police agencies country wide actively approve of a system that creates child pornography. Since it's approved by our government, one wonders if they're even enforcing those laws at all, and if they are, aren't they giving a legal out for those caught up in that shit?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •