you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -35 points 4 weeks ago (32 children)

Emotions or not, it's not good to have your product known for letting people torture something. Torturing /things/ alive or not is not something one should be doing unless there is specific and extreme cause.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 4 weeks ago (7 children)

    Things that aren’t alive can’t be tortured. You can’t torture a rock. Getting the text predictor to spit out the script for Saw XVII starring ChatGPT isn’t torture, even if it’s weird.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Maybe, but don't underestimate my ability to feel compassion for all kind of bullshit! That poor little rock 😭

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -26 points 4 weeks ago* (3 children)

    Brother you can torture a fucking doll (Voodoo, deranged kids, etc). The torture is not in consideration of how feeling-less thing feels, it's in consideration of the intent and action of the conscious thing doing the torture. Not sure why you think that's not the case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    ‘Pretend you’re being tortured’ as an instruction to the text generator is way less concerning in isolation than, say, decapitating and hanging a Barbie doll. And even that isn’t wildly concerning in itself. Do you freak out when kids smash their toys together to make them fight?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    I'd hope we can both agree there's a line when it becomes actual torture, and that is in the intent that went along with the action. Torture is an extreme action. I do not equate most of your references to torture, though I'd say the doll hanging could need a conversation with the child to discuss the intent behind their actions given more context.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    While I agree, it's not a living thing. So it's just an expression.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    I don't believe torture is measured at the receiving end. I believe it's in the intent and action of the conscious thing doing it. If it's an expression or not would then be heavily subjective on the specifics involved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    It inherently isn't torture though. I prefer punishing people who actually commit torture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    Eh, the more I respond to people about this the more I realize torture is a messy word draped in metaphor and all sorts of layered usage. No, I don't believe the rock has feelings or is alive, but you can indeed torture something that isn't alive by being mentally unhealthy enough. So if it's actual torture or not from a psychological perspective is going to center around if the person's intent is to cause realized suffering imo, and the line is really easy to cross in a simulacrum as seemingly realistic as advanced modern generative models.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Yet you're just arguing the metaphor is the definition provided the definition is the intent, are you not? Someone who intends to torture a rock, regardless of that intent, isn't going to succeed in their task. Their own psychology might be such that they are genuinely trying to torture it but, from the rock's perspective, the rock has no perspective. It's a fucking rock. It can't experience torture. It can't experience anything. Ergo the torturer cannot torture it.

    We can say the person who intends to literally torture something which is unexperiencing, achieving only metaphorical torture, is mentally unwell but to call the act literal torture because it was their intent is just sharing in their delusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Intent matters.

    My cat thinks I've betrayed her and all things good when i take her into the vet. I cause all sorts of terror in her. She even experiences pain that she can't stop or understand.

    Am I torturing her?

    Or, am i doing my best to make sure she has a healthy and happy life?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    Since you carried on with an example that isn't analogous, I'd extend your first sentence to be "Intent matters when the intended results are remotely feasible."

    You can't torture a rock. You could torture your cat. If she could speak she might say the events you describe are indeed torture from her perspective regardless of your own purity of intent. Still has fuckall to do with what I've said because you focused on an example where there is a mind capable of having an experience.

    Let's try this a couple other ways:

    My pet rock has no sense of "betrayal" or "good" when I take it to the vet. It's still a fucking rock. I mostly just cause all sorts of terror in the vet. My rock still doesn't experience and the vet doesn't understand.

    Am I torturing my pet rock?

    My LLM plays Word Association well enough to give an illusion of a sense of betrayal. I took it to the vet too and the vet is having me trespassed. I told her the LLM said "owie" but I was still removed from the premises.

    Am I torturing the LLM or just my former veterinarian?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

    Why shouldn't you torture an LLM? They sometimes work better that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    You shouldn't torture anything, generally. It's a not psychologically healthy urge to have. The specific reasoning will depend on the specific person. As for if you should do it to a hunk of metal, a rock, or your crusty cum sock is irrelevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Is killing NPCs in games on the same level like this for you, or a different thing altogether?

    Not judging or against it, I kind of half agree but also find very difficult to define where I'd draw a line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    I don't believe killing npcs or perhaps even more messily I could see circumstances where even /torturing npcs/ in a game is not actual torturing. I think it centers on the intent of the action, and if that intent is to cause actual realized suffering. It is very difficult to define and will be heavily subjective to the person, but I also think most people get a "sense" of where that line is naturally in person-to-person interactions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago

    If you define it by intent, then the same action performed by different people may be and not be torture. This makes it pretty hard to define, and it becomes completely subjective after that.

    For instance, I don't think it is possible to torture an inanimate object, thus I never have an intent of causing suffer to one. Sometimes I want to break an object, and by your definition it will not be torture however I do that

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    in what way can an AI be tortured? start with defining torture, its relationship to living beings, and then try to translate that to a piece of software. software, fyi, has no a priori, or even posteriori, emotion; for it cannot have emotion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    that doesn’t answer my question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    In what way can AI not have these thoughts or emotions?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Same reason flapping your arms really fast will never make you start flying. You don't have the equipment. You can't fly because that's not what arms do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment