854
Cruel and abusive behavior (lemmy.zip)
submitted 4 weeks ago by to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
174 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

It inherently isn't torture though. I prefer punishing people who actually commit torture.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    Eh, the more I respond to people about this the more I realize torture is a messy word draped in metaphor and all sorts of layered usage. No, I don't believe the rock has feelings or is alive, but you can indeed torture something that isn't alive by being mentally unhealthy enough. So if it's actual torture or not from a psychological perspective is going to center around if the person's intent is to cause realized suffering imo, and the line is really easy to cross in a simulacrum as seemingly realistic as advanced modern generative models.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Yet you're just arguing the metaphor is the definition provided the definition is the intent, are you not? Someone who intends to torture a rock, regardless of that intent, isn't going to succeed in their task. Their own psychology might be such that they are genuinely trying to torture it but, from the rock's perspective, the rock has no perspective. It's a fucking rock. It can't experience torture. It can't experience anything. Ergo the torturer cannot torture it.

    We can say the person who intends to literally torture something which is unexperiencing, achieving only metaphorical torture, is mentally unwell but to call the act literal torture because it was their intent is just sharing in their delusion.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Intent matters.

    My cat thinks I've betrayed her and all things good when i take her into the vet. I cause all sorts of terror in her. She even experiences pain that she can't stop or understand.

    Am I torturing her?

    Or, am i doing my best to make sure she has a healthy and happy life?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    Since you carried on with an example that isn't analogous, I'd extend your first sentence to be "Intent matters when the intended results are remotely feasible."

    You can't torture a rock. You could torture your cat. If she could speak she might say the events you describe are indeed torture from her perspective regardless of your own purity of intent. Still has fuckall to do with what I've said because you focused on an example where there is a mind capable of having an experience.

    Let's try this a couple other ways:

    My pet rock has no sense of "betrayal" or "good" when I take it to the vet. It's still a fucking rock. I mostly just cause all sorts of terror in the vet. My rock still doesn't experience and the vet doesn't understand.

    Am I torturing my pet rock?

    My LLM plays Word Association well enough to give an illusion of a sense of betrayal. I took it to the vet too and the vet is having me trespassed. I told her the LLM said "owie" but I was still removed from the premises.

    Am I torturing the LLM or just my former veterinarian?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent