57
Hope you like RCS, because Google Messages plans to remove this easy way to turn it off (www.androidauthority.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 1 month ago* (10 children)

Then federate, decentralize it, or abandon it to die. Let's not pretend Google is saving something sacred like a baby's life. They took up RCS to compete with Apple. This is not a tragedy, it was made this way by design.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I like that my Apple messages client can now participate in encrypted RCS chats. It’s still green boxes though. No competition, just raised the floor a little from SMS as the basic service

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Google didn't develop RCS, GSMA did. All google did was purchase the startup that actually developed a good implementation of it.

    This isnt some gatekeeping exercise from google, they had nothing to do with RCS's initial design and release. The carriers are entirely to blame for dragging their feet, although some are finally implementing their own servers (China is entirely RCS without google).

    As for "federate it, decentralise it", thats how it already is. Its called "hubbing", but its basically federation. The networks run their server, and the federate messages between them. It isn't centralised at all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Never said they developed it. They bought it for a reason though.

    Can we self-host a RCS server and hub with all the RCS network?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    They bought an implementation of RCS, the standard is still open. They even sell there implementation to a few telcos.

    You cant self host it because you need to be a telco, it has telco specific protocols. Also, this is one of the things that probably should be gatekept to telcos, if everyone were able to spin up their own instance, the spam problem would be unmanageable.

    Your looking for a conspiracy/monopoly that for once, doesnt exist due to Google being malicious. It exists because telcos are shit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Two entities can be shit, and also malicious, at the same time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    Google has historically done a lot of good things. Today they simply do evil, but pushing for RCS adoption when telcos refused to is one of those good things they did.

    You can still hate Google and want them to disappear, I do, but that doesn't mean you automatically hate everything ever touched by them. Their motivation may have been strictly to compete with Apple, but e2ee messages are a net positive if you must use it. Use signal and matrix when you can, use RCS when you must.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Google didn't buy it, it's an open standard.

    What google did is host RCS infrastructure and have the worlds most popular messaging client.

    You can absolutely setup an RCS server, build an FCS client that has the appropriate keys and access, put RCS relays in important peering points a over the world, and roll that out to millions of ppl yourself.

    Sort of like nuclear power; you could probably build a reactor yourself, but it's a heavy lift plus there are players that don't want you to.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •