you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 95 points 1 month ago* (27 children)

My windows "start" menu takes at least a full minute to open. Then, when I select, say, Control Panel, it takes another full minute, totally blank with no options

I'm not a programmer or even smart, but isn't that absolute shite? I've used Commodores, Apple II, Macs, 386, 486, have used windows since first job (I don't remember my first Windows version, but it played Tetris in color. Three? haha 3)

Menus have always worked before.

My next laptop will be linux Mint because I like mint ice cream. Does it have menus that open? I am super excited.

I apologize but it made me really mad and now i feel better.

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    Don't wait for the next laptop, just install Linux now.

    It sounds like your laptop is completely unusable anyway, and you can dual boot while you're figuring out if everything works

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    it's good to do it on a new laptop. It makes migration easier to have the old system alive next to it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Mint runs like a scalded dog on my hand-me-down Dell laptop. Yes, the menus work. I'd bet it runs amazing on newer hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    That's a high-voltage simile right there, goddamn

    Edit: and yes, on my high end custom rig it goes like greased shit through a... Lightning... Pig?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    It's one I picked up from one of my very country uncles when I was young. It just stuck.

    It's marginally better than "runs like a raped ape", as another , more city uncle used to say. Thankfully this boomer ass gem did not stick in my speech patterns.

    Edit: damn yakko, that is the first time I have seen you lose your way with words.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    That's because Windows 11 now uses React Native for a lot of things, including parts of the Start Menu. So something that shouldn't be, is extremely resource intensive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    But don't turn on the "display seconds" in the clock option. That would be an energy and resource waste, as the clock widget would have to be redrawn every second instead of every minute! Also, here's copilot. Talk to it, we need you to use it to justify all the resources we've wasted on it's development.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Yeah I only use windows at work now, ditched it at home. The start menu takes over a minute to open, and then when it does it ignores clicks for another minute.

    Then whenever I want to run outlook I have to search because the start menu doesnt let me set favourites. And I have to wait when I type in Outlook because the first search brings the crappy built in version of outlook (which I have clicked on more than once to be immensely frustrated to see it open) and then wait until "Outlook (classic)" appears and click that.

    I discovered some of my less technically able colleagues gave up on Outlook because they assumed it wasn't installed and use the web interface instead. And that is just one of numerous daily frustrations I get with Windows.

    Honestly, Windows is now a big steaming pile of crap. All my home devices are on Linux, and I only use Windows at work because I have no choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    i don't even use menus anymore. it's slow. heck I even hate using the mouse these days. We had the right idea back in the 80s and early 90s by running everything via the command line. it's faster. Now to open stuff I just use a launcher. it's faster to type what I want to run then it is to use a mouse to go find it in a menu.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    On Linux, I can pull up the system menu, type in a few letters of what I want to launch, and hit enter to get it started in less than 2 seconds, without having to open or switch windows to a terminal. Done right, there's nothing wrong with menus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I can pull up the system menu, type in a few letters of what I want to launch, and hit enter to get it started in less than 2 seconds, without having to open or switch windows to a terminal

    That's what I do in Windows, but I hit the Windows key instead of Enter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Yeah but as per the post, windows menu is taking forever to open...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    For me, the Windows key stroke can often be part of the next few letters I'm searching for, and my machine is a mid-range (at-best) build from 2020.

    And that was before I installed an app that gets rid of most of the junk in the Start menu, turning into just a Search field with a power button! Lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    on linux, I can just start typing what I want to launch. No menu needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Well you have to be typing it somewhere

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    As long as I am not actively using a window thats capturing input, it can be anywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments