Later in her statement:

We have a moral obligation to use our privilege and platforms to protect children and human rights.

She has been blasted 24/7 for not “staying in her lane”, so I think she understandably wants to draw a direct causal line explaining why this “is her lane”.

the anglosphere is the primary driver of the genocide happening in gaza rn

"The way people higher up our social hierarchies are reliably listened to over those lower down these unjust rankings is itself a major injustice. And it’s a pernicious everyday fact of life under oppressive systems like patriarchy and white supremacy. But there’s a right way and a wrong way to respond to the situation as a more privileged person. The right way involves speaking up when others who are less privileged won’t be heeded in the same way, and then using your power and privilege to amplify the voices of the marginalized folks who’ve long been shouting into the void. A wrong way is speaking over those who are better positioned to understand the issues due to their lived experience. But there’s another wrong way too: maintaining a scrupulous silence."

"When powerful and privileged white people speak in defense of Black and brown people subject to state violence and colonization and genocide, there’s often a long overdue moment of reckoning."

Source

If every white NFL owner donated $1 million, they'd make $30 million. Their net worths would go down by 0%

https://www.nfl.com/photos/team-owners-of-the-nfl-09000d5d824c9f3c#c45018dc-a23b-460a-a61e-d5c44840c095

I'm impressed, I haven't seen white fragility this fragile since the George Floyd uprising

Who has the most power in society in terms of racial disposition?

Sure, why not. Celebrities by definition have the attention of many people. I just don't see the point of narrowing that down even further.

Because Ms. Rachel is intelligent.