you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The f35 strikes me as being an impossible wartime asset. It’s tremendously complicated and needs a lot of support. We’re seeing in Ukraine that cheap assets can eliminate very expensive assets pretty easily, and as with previous industrialized wars, the ability to churn out many military assets beats technology.

In the current political climate, no country (except perhaps Israel) should be part of the f35 failure of a program.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It's a long range plane. Stealth means you can gets hundreds of miles closer to long distance radar detection before they can see you, letting you see and hit the enemy plane before they can see you. You don't see Ukraine giving up on planes just because they can be hit by a drone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    There’s a big difference between “giving up on planes” and giving up on the F35. For example, buying a simpler plane that can be manufactured in greater numbers, more quickly, at lower unit cost, that goes longer between scheduled maintenance, etc.

  • source
  • parent