you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 149 points 1 year ago (35 children)

The thing is just that its not that one woman, but hundreds of millions if not billions of people that follow trash separation rules.
This would actually have a pretty large effect, however sadly the recycling system is broken and often just a complete lie in many places in the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This is why I recycle.

    But it still sucks to see so much work undone by a few greedy fucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I appreciate your recycling efforts. I'm in Chicago where recycling rates are horrible. I'm building a plan to improve recycling rates for next year, but I still have a lot of work to do in terms of the system regarding transparency and user-friendliness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    the recycling system is broken and often just a complete lie in many places in the world.

    In many places in the world, or mainly the US? I keep seeing this claim repeated but usually any proof is just about the US

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Arent they still off-sourcing the actual recycling to a 3rd world country?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Especially for paper no … or rather it’s complicated. There is demand for recycled paper and we have lots of products which are made with these.

    If I understand it correctly, Germany imports more waste paper than it exports. But the quality between those two differs

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    I've ranted in various places over the years but it's 100% true in my city in Canada.

    Decades ago we built a massive publicly-funded recycling system because the City could actually draw profit from the collection and sale of materials.

    But about 15 years ago China stopped buying the waste, and it became a new shell-game of collecting the material but literally unable to do anything with it or sell it, so any that does get sold mostly ends up in the down-stream recycling economy, where the bulk of it ends up being burned. The rest goes into the regular old landfill. Even waste cardboard has no value anymore.

    People who separate recycling in our city now, are just pre-sorting it for the waste management company and keeping it out of their regular waste (profit) stream.

    We do have our ewaste centers but knowing people that work there, I can say anecdotally I've been informed that the metal and rare metal waste is collected and sent for processing in Ontario, the rest of the bits (all the plastic which is 90% of eWaste) goes into the regular waste stream where it's buried or burned, but never recycled.

    Notice how Pepsi and Coke don't use recycled plastic? If that doesn't condemn the whole recycling "meme" as a sham, I don't know what would.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Regarding the wording. In German(y) we have two kinds of "Verwertung" (utilization). The material one (recycling) and the energetic one (incineration). Both is viewed as reusing the waste. Sometimes energetic utilization can supply the power and/or heat needed for material utilization.

    Burning it doesn’t have to be as bad as burying it.

    EDIT: I guess it depends on how it gets burned. The company, my dad worked for, used it to produce steam, for the chemical companies located there, among other things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    But about 15 years ago China stopped buying the waste

    Guess where that waste used to go

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Don't be that smart ass that thinks he's cool and guarding some super secret information, and he only speaks in riddles and leading questions.

    Everybody knows where that plastic went.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Wow. You got it perfectly right: everybody knows where that plastic went. This is why I wrote it like that, and didn't have to explain how it got dumped in the ocean all along. I wasn't playing riddles, I assumed it was otherwise obvious and common knowledge. Jeez, sorry if it didn't come off the way I meant.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think a lot of first world countries like do it (e.g. the UK sends around 60% away), because recycling elsewhere is cheaper than doing it at home.

    And it's cheaper still if you don't bother to check that it hasn't just ended up in a landfill in Bangladesh or something.

    I think also part of the issue is that plastic can be recycled, but not in the same way as metals or glass. That plastic bottle might get shredded and used in road surfacing (where it will doubtless leak micro plastics everywhere), which is probably not what most people envisage when they clean it up and separate it nicely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    I had to check, and it looks like at least as far as plastic goes, in Finland it's sent to two domestic recycling plants, and everything they don't have the capacity to handle is shipped to Sweden's Site Zero in Motala (dunno where they go from there.)

    But yeah, something like using shredded plastic for road surfacing definitely isn't what I'd call a sensible way to recycle the material. It's just adding an extra step before getting to "microplastic endocrine disruptors EVERYWHERE"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Isn't it somewhere like only 1% of the recycling stuff actually getting recycled? The rest goes to some kind of landfill to a poor country that decides to take it. I saw this in some documentary

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    For plastics, pretty much. The thing about plastic recycling is that it's more expensive that making new plastic, and the recycled stuff is lower quality and unsuitable for many uses.

    Metal.recycling, especially aluminum, makes economic sense and does better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Like it’s been said that differs vastly by location. Afaik here in Germany it works quite okay … and European countries tend to have a higher incineration rate than the US. Burning the trash certainly isn’t the best solution, but at least it converts them into energy instead of just burying it somewhere.

    But that aside, I like these "new" cups. It replaces part of the plastic with cardboard. That allows the plastic to be thinner, focusing on sealing it up and the cardboard handle the stability or even light protection. Though it can definitely be that there are some which are still as thick as they were, but that wouldn’t make sense for the producer. Here in Germany the plastic is often see-through and the cardboard printed on both sides. That’s usually used as advertising space, infos for waste disposal, but I’ve even seen it being used for cup noodles to mark the fill level.

    Afaik paper is the thing where reycling works best currently, so it should be a win to replace plastic with paper.

    The recycling rate increased in 2023. 79.3% of all paper and board consumed in Europe was recycled

    - https://austropapier.at/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/23-00-EPRC-Recycling-Report.pdf

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

    Recycling (edit: besides metal) does literally nothing, like it's actually 0% helpful, as long as we're producing more plastic than ever before every single year. We're closing in on 500 million tonnes of plastic produced—not total, produced—annually. Every single person can put every single piece of plastic in the recycling bin, and we'll still have more plastic than existed 50 years ago. There are many things that individual action can accomplish, and this is not one of them. We need legislation for this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    IIRC plastic recycling is basically bullshit (except maybe PET bottles?) but aluminum is actually effective. Makes you wonder why we don't use more aluminum packaging in general.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Plastic isnt the only material that you can recycle...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    True, that honor belongs solely to metal. Glass is mostly recyclable, though most types of it that aren't bottles will just be thrown in the trash. Paper is in theory recyclable, but putting that in recycle bins is basically just as effective as putting plastic in. Neither of those actually helps as long as we're producing more and more paper and more and more glass every year. The only thing that helps is reducing production.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Paper can be composted or burnt, and will decompose relatively quickly if dumped. I can't see any post-use situation where paper is anywhere nearly as bad as plastic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    What does that have to do with the production of new paper? Deforestation remains an ever increasing problem. It's not as bad as plastic, but recycling it is just as futile

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Recycling paper (or not recycling) is far better than plastic is every respect. It's not so much futility in this case so much as inefficiency.

    Paper also is rarely, if ever, fully recycled, usually being downcycled into rougher and rougher materials like cardboard and egg cartons. No matter how well it gets recycled, it's not going to displace primary production.

    If you want to talk about futility here, the problem is way bigger than recycling. It's consumerism, unrestrained capitalism, and ROI of power now vs power later. No amount of recycling of any quality will fix the world alonge but it is one step of many.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The latter half of your comment is why I dont even bother. The "recycling" here is picked up and dumped into the same truck, there is no separation facility, just a landfill/incinerator.

    Im not paying extra to lie to myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • i lost faith in recycling the more I read about it.

    especially when most recycling is sent to poor countries to be burned, and if it is actually recycled it is then shipped back again as a single use spoon, then sent back... all the way to less quality materials, and some uses are for fleece that produces a shit ton of microplastics.

    real solutions is to ban single use plastics (maybe exceptions for medical uses).

    now I'm in the States and I have no idea how to recycle where I am anyways.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    We have separate trucks here, but I was behind the recycling truck one day and watched it pull into the landfill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I remember my home district had one spot that handled both trash and recycling, so maybe there’s a chance of it still getting somewhere useful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment