The issue here is about whether or not he's dead and it's being covered up. You asked what law would apply, and I'm telling you that if his death is being hidden, then it's an example of fraud. Not to mention conspiracy.

I didn't "make up" laws. Fraud is a law.

And no, I didn't "assume" that he's dead. Fuck, it's like you have no idea about the context of this entire fucking story. Or you're just arguing in bad faith, which is the more likely explanation.

It seems disengenuous to make claims about the law and then hide behind "I'm not a lawyer, bro" when confronted about it.

It's not disingenuous at all. This is a web forum, not a court room. It's where people discuss things in a conversational way. If you want to litigate this before a judge, then go to a Kentucky circuit court. I'm not going to spend hours poring over kentucky legal codes just to prove a point to you.

Maybe, if you don't know anything about the law, you shouldn't discuss the law.

You could say this about any field, and you'd be equally wrong. People don't need to be doctors to talk about covid, people don't need to be historians to talk about ancient Greece, and people don't need to be engineers to talk about technology.

You asked a question in a forum and got an answer, and the bone you want to pick is that the person responding isn't a lawyer? That's pathetic. You're not a lawyer either.

Oh, by the way, the governor of kentucky has the state's attorneys general as a resource, whose entire jobs it is to know kentucky state law. Go ask them your questions if you want an expert fucking opinion. You're on lemmy.

Your last point goes both ways, bro