sadge (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 152 points 3 months ago* (80 children)

the list for anyone wondering

Just know that everyone on that list is a violent extremist including me

  • source
  • hideshow 80 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 3 months ago (40 children)

    I don't get it. Is this some personal vendetta the dev has? Have they really been in this many internet arguments? Where did this list come about and why?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 40 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 80 points 3 months ago (19 children)

    It is not fully optional. It was obfuscated and unremovable. That's why the backlash has been so severe.

    Not to mention, why should a user interface make that decision? That's up to individual server admins and their userbase.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Lol. TIL I'm a violent extremist. Me. Boring, professional, suit wearing, family of four having, generic white guy.

    The world this guy lives in must be truly weird.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    people are not "free to stop using it" if the instance admin is using it.

    honestly I don't even give a fuck about me being on "the list" anymore. I'm more upset that he decided for hundreds if not thousands of users without consulting them or taking into consideration of their opinions.

    he took the choice away from them, and that's kind of the problem with tech anymore.

    @ptz@dubvee.org is a scammy piece of shit that got caught and is attempting to do damage control now.

    don't his users and his users users deserve transparency?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 42 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Lmfao. I didn't make it more than a few paragraphs because it's written with the maturity of a 10 year old in a chocolate sausage museum.

    You can really tell they're up for an honest and open conversation with the community, really trying to improve the Fediverse, with their locking of all comments.

    He's clearly the toxic one and is projecting his issues onto hundreds of others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    THAT list is able to be disabled, though people are mad about its discoverability and transparency.

    The OTHER list, the smaller instance-level one, reportedly cannot be disabled, seemingly the only recourse for those instances on it are to use his fork of the code.

    This is from db0's reporting, I have not attempted to confirm personally, but I would be happy to be corrected if need be.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    some personal vendetta

    Seems like it's hubris / arrogance - a poorly considered attempt to create some kind of ideal social experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 31 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    Here's their full explanation: https://lemmy.world/post/49817942

    It's pretty long and includes some insightful details about implementation (making the blocklist's usage at the discretion of the instance admin though not transparent of its contents and defaulting it to enabled) but this quote boils down the underlying sentiment pretty well:

    “These are all rough edges of the threadiverse which I am attempting to round off so we might actually be able to retain some level headed people instead of scraping the bottom of the barrel by being a dumping ground for people rejected by civil society."

    When you examine the list, by and large, it's pretty reasonable. Lots of false news, state propaganda, spammers, etc. But also the entire lemmy.blahaj.zone instance (where many of lemmy's trans denizens call home). We're included in what the lead developer describes as "bottom of the barrel" "people rejected by civil society."

    Though I do fear the backlash. You've got a bunch of malicious spammers, hate-mongers and blackhat state actors who now have an open window to cause a lot of harm (harassment & general sowing of discontent) with the convenient smoke screen of upset trans folks who it can be blamed on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I'll give a short description of the long post.

    big fuckin baby

    also, I have to call him not just a dumbass but a malicious dumbass.

    "Someone leaked the list. Why am I on it??"

    A: The list was never hidden just not advertised (lest people game it). I also could have encrypted it, but I merely compressed it for efficiency. If you're on the list, then one of the 10 reasons above applies.

    the file in question was placed obscurely. updated without directly calling out what it was. and published without notifying users.

    seems a lot of effort went into obfuscating the true purpose of the file.

    while on the subject of obfuscation. he claimed he "compressed it for efficiency".

    he compressed it, then base64 encoded it. why? why compress it to only expand the size of the file by encoding it??

    @ptz@dubvee.org is a dumbass and a shitty dev if he thinks any of the bullshit he said was worth the time it took to say it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    Really? I'm malicious spammer, hate-monger or blackhat state actor? News to me, but good to know.

    Though I do fear the backlash. You’ve got a bunch of malicious spammers, hate-mongers and blackhat state actors who now have an open window to cause a lot of harm (harassment & general sowing of discontent) with the convenient smoke screen of upset trans folks who it can be blamed on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    You're assuming his apologia is not disingenuous. The notes he added in the commit messages and the extent to which he blocked users who were indirectly implicated in his accusations don't line up with his explanations.

    There's also the fact that much of it is caught under a very broad net of "promoting violence" without any examples provided of what constitutes such a thing. He used that exact explanation to justify banning blahaj.zone, where he said that some users did so and the admins did not act on it, which prompted him to blacklist the entire instance and the admins specifically.

    This isn't even getting into the intentional inaccuracies about the nature of his "Toxic Mode", or his entire rant on db0 which is not only dishonest and weirdly personal, but also straight up lying about what happened and why. There's zero way to say that exposing his blacklist is "going Karen" like he did, and it's a straight lie to say that nobody had a problem with his blacklisting until db0 complained when the situation is that db0 made the existence of the blocklist known.

    The philosophy of federation is that such whims should be openly handled on the federation level, not in a secret blacklist of a front end that was openly available to all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago*

    All of this shit falls flat when the dev themself admits they hid the feature to disable deep in the app and even called it "toxic mode". Is saying "perchance" toxic? Because that's one of their blocked phrases. Fuck no, it's not. This is just shit the personally dislike and put it in under the guise of making the fediverse more normie friendly.

    As if silently hiding content with phrases like "perchance" and causing a massive drama makes the fediverse more normie friendly.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 42 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Are you trying to create drama and play the victim while complaining about other people supposedly creating drama and playing the victim?

    They have a cure for that, it's called fucking off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    did you read the devs reply?, He definitely wasn't saying this was for annoying people who misconstrue things

    As will be explained further, there are 10 rules that are enforced, the biggest one being a very basic “don’t be a violent extremist”. That’s probably 30% of the list. Another 50% are just alts of Dwazou (persistent, long-term ban evader), and the remaining 20% just garden-variety spammers and toxic people who scare the normies away.

    I'm not an alt of dwazou, or a spammer so guess that just leaves violent extremist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    To the fascist nazi scumbag, “violent extremist” means anyone that opposes genocide, anyone that has espoused consequences for murder, torture, and oppression, or anyone that has ever made fun of Charlie “Goebbels” Kirk.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    I'm not on the list, and have been thinking if they want to curate their instance/app whatever it was that's their right.

    But "Jessi?e Welle?s" is on the list? I get he's political, but if you don't like what he's saying I think I'd rather associate with the people on the list because if they're being put next to Jessie they're probably good people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    At this point they should just have a whitelist, that's a hell of a list! There's some users I recognise from my instance who are chill so I can't imagine how they ended up on this list.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    What the fuck did violet do to make the list?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I feel like one of the things he said was that he blacklisted people who "regularly post things normal people don't want to see" (or something along those lines). I assumed that was a blanket statement to cover Violet and anyone else whose posts have made him feel uncomfortable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (8 replies)