907
sadge (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
219 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 80 points 3 months ago (19 children)

It is not fully optional. It was obfuscated and unremovable. That's why the backlash has been so severe.

Not to mention, why should a user interface make that decision? That's up to individual server admins and their userbase.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
    •
  • [+] -21 points 3 months ago (16 children)

    The author offers a lengthy explanation in their own words as to precisely why this was done. TLDR: people are free to stop using it, but he's making these changes because he wants to offer this service on behalf of those who don't enjoy all the toxicity here.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Lol. TIL I'm a violent extremist. Me. Boring, professional, suit wearing, family of four having, generic white guy.

    The world this guy lives in must be truly weird.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I mean, to be fair, here is that entire paragraph for context:

    As will be explained further, there are 10 rules that are enforced, the biggest one being a very basic “don’t be a violent extremist”. That’s probably 30% of the list. Another 50% are just alts of Dwazou (persistent, long-term ban evader), and the remaining 20% just garden-variety spammers and toxic people who scare the normies away.

    Based on this, it is much more likely that you are an alt of Dwazou. (Or maybe I am? 🤪 Statistically, between the three of us, you me and the author, ONE of us must be!!)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    people are not "free to stop using it" if the instance admin is using it.

    honestly I don't even give a fuck about me being on "the list" anymore. I'm more upset that he decided for hundreds if not thousands of users without consulting them or taking into consideration of their opinions.

    he took the choice away from them, and that's kind of the problem with tech anymore.

    @ptz@dubvee.org is a scammy piece of shit that got caught and is attempting to do damage control now.

    don't his users and his users users deserve transparency?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -14 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yes they do but the irony present in your reply is palpable.

    Incels upon being told no simply create an alt to evade bans.

    Tesseract bans them anyway.

    WoN't SoMeOnE pLeAsE tHiNk oF tHe children BaN eVaDeRs?!

    Sadge :-(

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 42 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Lmfao. I didn't make it more than a few paragraphs because it's written with the maturity of a 10 year old in a chocolate sausage museum.

    You can really tell they're up for an honest and open conversation with the community, really trying to improve the Fediverse, with their locking of all comments.

    He's clearly the toxic one and is projecting his issues onto hundreds of others.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Your TLDR reeeeeeealllllly buries the lede.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    Fair, I guess that was more my own take-away from it than summary! :-P

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Eh, I guess my opinion is somewhat colored by seeing some of the things they decided to block. Like "perchance" stood out. None of that specific information was in this post.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    No, the transparency aspect is really the biggest part of all of this. Like, do whatever you want, but make sure to state clearly what you're doing rather than hide it.

    Similar to PieFed's voting quota: even admins were surprised how their own instances were behaving when the code update came through and they had no idea why it was limiting votes.

    Actually, that's always been my beef with lemmy.ml: be loud and proud a tankie as you want to be - OWN that shit, you know!?! - but don't lie to people that you are "just a place to discuss FOSS". Banning people from their instance is fine and their right, but when they are disingenuous about the reason, citing a rule that does not say anything remotely close to what it really means, the way that they wield it... that tends to make people upset, you know? (And there are several communities dedicated to calling out that shit, like MeanwhileOnGrad.)

    Lotta weird decisions going around. I just try to stay sane through it all... and perchance I fail 😜

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent