you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 46 points 4 months ago (61 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 38 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Which one? I'm vetting them to see who has the better dental plan. There's just so many to choose from, it's tough to decide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    There are a lot of gods, so which one? Also, i never saw a god showing love to me, did i got left behind? Damn it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    he expressed the ultimate love to us on the Cross

    By masochistically sacrificing Himself, to Himself, to pay a price He chose to charge of His own free will, in order to cleanse us of the "taint" of actions He considers sins.

    For the sake of argument let's assume what you believe happened happened and that your god is real. The problem with omnipotence is that you can't blaim anyone else for the system you set up. The crucifixion didn't need to happen to "free us from sin", God wanted to incarnate into a mortal form and be tortured to death. Why? I cannot say, but He could have chosen some other way. He could choose to not threaten us with eternal torture simply for not loving Him. That isn't love.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    God is a fair judge, and he cant just let people off UNLESS someone else takes the punishment

    Why not? Seriously. He set up the system. Why require punishment in that system? Jesus and God are the same person (hence "triune" ), so He essentially had us torture and kill Himself to appease His own vengeance.

    He could have forgiven us without preconditions. He chose to require punishment. Then He chose to be tortured and killed . Now He demands that we thank him for it or He'll punish us for eternity. That's psychopath behavior.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago

    you being born

    WAIT SO MY MOM HAD AN AFFAIR WITH GOD?!

    being alive

    No need to slap it again in my face TwT

    having food

    He never paid a dime duh

    having a machine to comment this

    I am sure that i have this phone because some chinese kid manufactured this, unless...THE KID IS GOD??
    This is a lot to process...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1879 or Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    the complete absence of upvotes on this lmfao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    if "god" "loves" me then why does its book say it hates me (im queer)

    when have there ever been signs of a real god

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi8HT6Ux8FM (invidious: https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=zi8HT6Ux8FM )

    (long) transcript of that song:I have an apology to make. I'm afraid I've made a big mistake. I turned my face away from you, Lord.

    I was too blind to see the light. I was too weak to feel Your might. I closed my eyes; I couldn't see the truth, Lord.

    But then like Saul on the Damascus road, you sent a messenger to me, and so ...

    Now I've have had the truth revealed to me. Please forgive me all those things I said. I'll no longer betray you, Lord. I will pray to you instead.

    And I will say Thank you, thank you, thank you God. Thank you, thank you, thank you God.

    Thank you God for fixing the cataracts of Sam's mum.

    I had no idea but it's suddenly so clear now. I feel such a cynic. How could I have been so dumb?

    Thank you for displaying how praying works: a particular prayer in a particular church. Thank you Sam for the chance to acknowledge this omnipotent opthamologist.

    Thank you God for fixing the cataracts of Sam's mum. I didn't realize that it was so simple, but you've shown a great example of just how it can be done.

    You only need to pray in a particular spot to a particular version of a particular god, and if you pull that off without a hitch, he will fix one eye of one middle-class white bitch.

    I know in the past my outlook has been limited. I couldn't see examples of where life had been definitive. But I can admit it when the evidence is clear, as clear as Sam's mum's new cornea.

    That's extremely clear! Extremely clear!

    Thank you God for fixing the cataracts of Sam's mum. I have to admit that in the past I have been skeptical but Sam described this miracle and I am overcome!

    How fitting that the sighting of a sight-based intervention should open my eyes to this exciting new dimension. It's like someone put an eye chart up in front of me and the top five letters say: I C G O D.

    Thank you, Sam, for showing how my point of view has been so flawed. I assumed there was no God at all but now I see that's cynical. It's simply that his interests aren't particularly broad.

    He's largely undiverted by the starving masses, or the inequality between the various classes. He gives you strictly limited passes, redeemable for surgery or two-for-one glasses.

    I feel so shocking for historically mocking you. Your interests are clearly confined to the ocular. I bet given the chance, you'd eschew the divine and start a little business selling contacts online.

    Fuck me Sam, what are the odds that of history's endless parade of gods that the God you just happened to be taught to believe in is the actual one and he digs on healing, but not the AIDS-ridden African nations, nor the victims of the plague or the flood-addled Asians, but healthy, privately-insured Australians with common and curable corneal degeneration

    This story of Sam's has but a single explanation: a surgical God who digs on magic explanations. No it couldn't be mistaken attribution of causation, born of a coincidental temporal correlation, exacerbated by a general lack of education vis-a-vis physics in Sam's parish congregation. And it couldn't be that all these pious people are liars. It couldn't be an artifact of confirmation bias, a product of groupthink, a mass delusion, an Emperor's New Clothes-style fear of exclusion.

    No, it's more likely to be an all-powerful magician than the misdiagnosis of the initial condition, or one of many cases of spontaneous remission, or a record-keeping glitch by the local physician.

    No, the only explanation for Sam's mum's seeing: they prayed to an all-knowing superbeing, to the omnipresent master of the universe, and he liked the sound of their muttered verse.

    So for a bit of a change from his usual stunt of being a sexist, racist, murderous cunt, he popped down to Dandenong and just like that, used his powers to heal the cataracts of Sam's mum of Sam's mum!

    Thank you God for fixing the cataracts of Sam's mum! I didn't realize that it was such a simple thing. I feel such a dingaling, what ignorant scum!

    Now I understand how prayer can work: a particular prayer in a particular church in a particular style with a particular stuff and a particular book for particular problems that aren't particularly tough, and for particular people, preferably white, for particular senses, preferably sight, a particular prayer in a particular spot, to a particular version of a particular god.

    And if you get that right, He just might take a break from giving babies malaria and pop down to your local area to fix the cataracts of your mum!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    because if you want to succeed let alone survive in life the attitude needs to change or it needs to hide.

    Framing things this way is a big mistake and I don't see why it isn't more obvious to people that it's a mistake. You want someone you care about to believe that there is a binary choice between a sustainable existence and resolving their emotional needs? You couldn't make a more persuasive argument for suicidal thinking and self destructive behavior if you tried. And it isn't even true because they are mutually dependent priorities. It took me too many years and therapy to figure this out, you should really consider approaching the issue from a different angle than this one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago*

    "If you don't learn to adopt them you will isolate yourself" might be true if there was 1 neurodivergent person. We are a community and personally I'm not interested in being more than acquaintances if I have to mask around you all the time. That's not a mutually beneficial relationship.

    Autistics are constantly told this lie and it completely ignores the fact that there's plenty of other autistics that will understand and accommodate each other's needs.

    This is an ableist way to see the world and my lived experience directly contradicts it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (11 children)

    Perfectly reasonable but let's also recognize that some social norms exist only because of tradition, and are unnecessary & uncomfortable, these social norms need to be questioned & challenged & done away with. When enough people question them and challenge them, and eventually get rid of some unnecessary oppressive social norms, we can continue to evolve as a species.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] [S] 7 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    The issue isn't people choosing to behave a certain way, it's the expectation that everyone need to behave that way. If people want to do the same as everyone else, fine. If the standards ultimately don't matter, then who cares?

    In my experience, the people who hate me for not following them wouldn't like me even if I tried to play along. I am often more respected when I confidently stand as myself than when I try to follow the rules as meekly as possible. If I'm gonna be freak either way, I'm better off keeping my head held high.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago* (6 children)

    If people are actively excluding somebody for being themselves, especially in a workplace, that is a problem that needs addressed.

    It's one thing if you're being yourself and not being respectful at all, such as violating somebody's space or taking up their time excessively, it's another to silently shun somebody because they perceivably "went their whole lives being catered to".

    That's discrimination. You said it yourself, "But don’t cry about it when no one else wants to accept that kind of thing."

    Not accepting is discrimination. You can communicate your needs, such as a need for focus or a reduction in non-work conversation, without being a dick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Someone avoiding a person is not discrimination. People are not entitled to other peoples' time or patience. That's what I'm trying to say here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

    Avoiding is another level of discrimination. If you don't like someone or you are uncomfortable talking to someone, then say so instead of contributing to the culture of discrimination that they face.

    Communicate your needs instead of acting like you don't owe people basic respect because they were perceivably catered to... because they are different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    No it's not. Lol.

    Not every person deserves an answer for every action around them. I'm sorry, but that's just not realistic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    You can very briefly and politely say to them that you don't wish for small talk, or you can tell someone who isn't on your team to not engage you in conversation because you want to focus during work.

    Being direct is better than looking away, walking away, and pretending to be busy whenever they come around you. That has the potential for real hurt.

    What if everywhere you walked in, everywhere you worked at, you got that sort of reaction from others. Masking or not masking. Whether you are being yourself or being somebody you're not to please others? Have you ever experienced that?

    Can you even imagine how isolating that must feel?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I never said to do any of those things. I said that people who want these things also need to realize, that it's not everyone elses job to be their life-interpreter for them, and cater to their needs.

    I have my needs not met all the time in public settings. It sucks, but that's life. Everyone is doing the same thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    I'm not sure what experiences you have had where you were ever in a situation where a disabled person came to you looking for in-depth support, but that isn't the norm.

    You can very easily set a boundary with others outside of your team, but realize that not supporting somebody on your team and setting them up to succeed can cause a negative outcome. You don't need to hold their hand, just explain what they don't understand or find someone who can.

    I have my needs not met all the time in public settings. It sucks, but that’s life. Everyone is doing the same thing.

    Everybody should have their needs met and that is an ideal that is worth striving for.

    If you're not called or have it in you to help support disabled people, there's nothing wrong with that. It's not discrimination. But I will say that being a good neighbor and a friend to others is something most people notice and respect. Even the smallest acts of kindness towards disabled people can be appreciated more than you know.

    You don't need to spend effort to be kind, depending on your disposition. Thanks for engaging.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 40 points 4 months ago (18 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (16 children)

    Aren't you the guy who thinks some invisible, male entity created the entire universe? Did this male and masculine entity create evil and is he now powerless to stop it? Or is it that this invisible penis having guy actually enjoys the suffering and tortures souls for eternity?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (15 children)

    That's weird. The Bible is pretty specific about god's gender. God created everything but not evil? So god didn't actually create everything then? Or is he just powerless to stop it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (14 children)

    That's not the point. HE, as you refer to HIM as, can either be powerful enough to destroy all evil or is not good so does not stop evil from happening. Whether eradicating evil destroys you or not is irrelevant. Your existence contradicts your teachings.

    So your penis having God, that used his penis to impregnate a virgin and cuck her fiance, is either not all powerful or not all good. Which is it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Not sure what you mean.

    I get it man. When you're at church you can all just say whatever you want and everyone nods their heads. But if you want to come out into the real world and push your harmful rhetoric on others you need to be prepared to answer questions. So just saying things that don't make any sense and expecting people to go along with it won't work like it does in your echo chamber. You need to actually explain yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)
  • Oh that's fun. Read through it and it's a long winded regurgitating of what you already tried to pull off without success. It avoids actually answering the question of why your god isn't powerful enough to eradicate evil while preserving humans and free will. Then still claims your god is all powerful. Can't have both no matter how many Bible verses you quote or paragraphs you write while not answering the question.

    The great part of this article is that it gets even more morally bankrupt than you have been. After lots of exposition about how it's ok that evil exists cuz reasons and God is mysterious etc, it goes on to say:

    1. The ends justify the means. It's ok that a good and all powerful god sits back with some popcorn and allows all this suffering to happen because some day when he gets around to it, he will rapture everyone who believes and continue to torture everyone who doesn't. Catholicism is truly evil for being ok with this and has no place in a moral society.

    2. The old, just trust bro. This is the one that is always the actual answer. It's always at the end because of how flimsy it is but it's always there because it's really obvious that god does not exist. Plugging your ears and saying I don't care really loud over and over is the only way to keep believing. "Yeah we know it's completely idiotic to believe this stuff but believing things that make no sense is actually a virtue! We call it faith instead of being gullible because that sounds better."

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    As someone with that, I say, fuck off to that "authority".

    Social norms are to be broken. We didn't get Stonewall riots by following police and law and order. We didn't get women's rights by meekly letting men trample us. We didn't get general suffrage by not rioting. We didn't get the right to strike by doing nothing.

    I think the attitude you're being held back by, is more destructive. You're willfully following rules instead of questioning them, then deciding whether they are justified to follow or not.

    I think what you're telling is not a "harsh reality" but a fabrication that neurotypical people tell themselves to justify "following orders". Fuck that shit.

    If I did what you said me to, I'd be in a much worse mental headspace now. I feel sorry for your son. You blindly following social norms IS the problem. Try to address that instead. Try to actually understand why your son finds it difficult. Most of us find it difficult because the authority is not justified: there's no explanation, not even an imperfect one. We're instead told to just suck it up instead of hearing, "hey, yeah, you got a point." or even just engaging the discussion. Let it be the other way around. You go try to think if there's something that you both could agree as justified for a rule. If such a thing isn't there, then no need for the rule. Good authority doesn't flow from "because I say so", but from clear and justifiable rules.

    I'm not going to mask myself because others refuse to take others into account. I have plenty of good interaction when I am not forced into masking, and less when I have to mask.

    Let me ask you a question. Have you ever gone through what your son is going through with you now? Should a good parent not want to try to understand their child instead, rather than to force their own norms onto their descendant?

  • source
  • parent