you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

Carbon dating gives you an approximate age under the assumption that the carbon you're looking at followed the same dynamics at all time points preceding the present moment. It does not prove in any way that the assumption is true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    The assumption doesn't lead to the potential for things that are 6000 years old being dated to millions/billions of years old though. The error margin is more in the range of 2 to 5%.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment