you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Nintendo aren't the ones who set the price

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    no, they don't. but the game has been out for 5 years at this point.

    articles like these seem quite pointless to anyone who doesn't already own a switch 2. and possibly pointless even to people who own a switch 2, but have already played cyberpunk on better or similar hardware.

    this article is an attempt to pat a multi billion dollar company on the back so it doesn't feel as bad that people aren't racing out to buy their 5-year-late, overpriced attempts to dominate the handheld market again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Possibly the dumbest take I've ever seen on this site, are you saying an article objectively comparing the performance of two handhelds is "an attempt to pat a multi billion dollar company on the back"?

    articles like these seem quite pointless to anyone who doesn't already own a switch 2.

    "Performance comparisons are pointless if the results aren't what I like", I'm sure if the steam deck performed a lot better you would be in the comments singing praises for it. Digital foundry have been comparing performance for many years but suddenly now their findings are worthless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah they'd never shill for Nintendo and fail to disclose it was an ad https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V10wHzV5zp0

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments