you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 60 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Copyright was invented so artists would be able to sell their art, and more art would be made.

When copyright is protected on a product that's no longer sold, less art is made.

When a copyright holder stops selling their art, copyright protections should immediately cease, and they should be responsible for copyright obligations - releasing the source code to the public. Use it or lose it!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Pretty sure it was so publishers (printing press owners) could have a guaranteed profit. Those two things (publisher and artist profits) were correlated at the time. Not so much anymore. Streaming/subscription mentality is like planned obsolescence for IP.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This is the most level headed approach to IP I've seen. If you're not willing to use the property you forfeit it. It's a common contact for licensing rights for movies that forces a studio to make a movie or lose rights. That way people can't squat on a licence to prevent others using it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments