you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 203 points 7 months ago (37 children)

Great... can't wait for politicians to use this as a way to pass "common sense" legislation banning 3D printers.

  • source
  • hideshow 37 child comments
  • [–] 91 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    Aren't they already doing that due to their hysteria over "ghost" guns?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    I learned from Mario that ghosts can only harm you if you look away. They never had guns, but I guess the same applies for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    They can try, but the parts that make up a printer are used in tons of other applications. It isn't hard to build one from scratch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago

    They already are over 3d guns, this will send them ballistic. They want every printer to keep a record of everything they've printed. Model legislation, I think CA tried and so far failed to pass it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    3D printers are even less useful here though. The rocket bit can be replaced with a cardboard tube and some balsa fins. The important parts are the active control and circuitry.

    But I guess logic doesn't really enter into the conversation anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 6 points 7 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (10 children)

    This already would fall under an FFL for legal citizens anyway. As is the nature of the internet though, this open design will be preserved and available for those who seek it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    Most western terrorist attacks are by opportunistic losers who don’t have the knowledge or motivation to do something like this.

    They’d rather drive a car into people who make them angry and use a gun they already own.

    As for organized groups until recently there have been any good reason for an attack from any centrally organized group.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The lack of simple attacks on soft targets is proof that the threat is overstated and that a statistically overwhelming portion of humans simply don't want to put bombs on busses and rig them to explode on bridges or in tunnels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    Being in that category just prevents it from being sold. It's not illegal federally to build your own weapon without a FFL.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Is that the same rule for destructive devices? Genuinely curious - I know privately made firearms have different rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I wonder if there is some archive or torrent for STL files, like an archive of thingiverse or something. Would be nice to archive that just in case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago*

    Is that even necessary? Anyone with a CAD tool can recreate the 3D printed parts from a glance and a few specs.

    It's literally a tube. Which—to be fair—is a "weapon of mass destruction" according to President Bush (the other war criminal president).

  • source
  • parent