you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 6 points 7 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (10 children)

    This already would fall under an FFL for legal citizens anyway. As is the nature of the internet though, this open design will be preserved and available for those who seek it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    Most western terrorist attacks are by opportunistic losers who don’t have the knowledge or motivation to do something like this.

    They’d rather drive a car into people who make them angry and use a gun they already own.

    As for organized groups until recently there have been any good reason for an attack from any centrally organized group.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The lack of simple attacks on soft targets is proof that the threat is overstated and that a statistically overwhelming portion of humans simply don't want to put bombs on busses and rig them to explode on bridges or in tunnels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    Being in that category just prevents it from being sold. It's not illegal federally to build your own weapon without a FFL.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Is that the same rule for destructive devices? Genuinely curious - I know privately made firearms have different rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments