▲ 276 ▼ Nuclear energy enjoyers vindicated again after the rise in oil and gas prices. (mander.xyz) submitted 8 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 4 points 8 months ago (3 children) We should ban petrol except for ambulances and fire engines permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 months ago Ambulances and fire engines are probably an example of a top choices to convert to ev. They don’t drive far at all and they are parked at a central location most of the time. Also puts incentives to install solar panels at hospitals and fire stations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) We should be banning, or more accurately, phasing out combustion engines for all vehicles including government and emergency vehicles. If anything should be EVs these should be it. Also consider that American fire trucks are massively oversized compared to ones in the rest of the world. They don't need to be that big, and thus more compact European-style ones could easily be replaced with electric equivalents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago Combustion engines will likely have a place for a long time. Large equipment just doesn't do well on battery power. They can't get the required runtime. Also, in places where they are used, electrical power is often limited. Hydrocarbons are an excellent way of storing energy. We will also need to overproduce renewables, to keep grids stable. Synthetic hydrocarbons could be a good solution to both issues. Currently, they are nowhere close to competing with fossil fuels, but that will change in time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 months ago Ambulances and fire engines are probably an example of a top choices to convert to ev. They don’t drive far at all and they are parked at a central location most of the time. Also puts incentives to install solar panels at hospitals and fire stations. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) We should be banning, or more accurately, phasing out combustion engines for all vehicles including government and emergency vehicles. If anything should be EVs these should be it. Also consider that American fire trucks are massively oversized compared to ones in the rest of the world. They don't need to be that big, and thus more compact European-style ones could easily be replaced with electric equivalents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago Combustion engines will likely have a place for a long time. Large equipment just doesn't do well on battery power. They can't get the required runtime. Also, in places where they are used, electrical power is often limited. Hydrocarbons are an excellent way of storing energy. We will also need to overproduce renewables, to keep grids stable. Synthetic hydrocarbons could be a good solution to both issues. Currently, they are nowhere close to competing with fossil fuels, but that will change in time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago Combustion engines will likely have a place for a long time. Large equipment just doesn't do well on battery power. They can't get the required runtime. Also, in places where they are used, electrical power is often limited. Hydrocarbons are an excellent way of storing energy. We will also need to overproduce renewables, to keep grids stable. Synthetic hydrocarbons could be a good solution to both issues. Currently, they are nowhere close to competing with fossil fuels, but that will change in time. permalink fedilink source parent