you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 36 points 9 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I do think it's important that we check ourselves. Having a lot footage I think also plays a big role, George Floyd being another example.

    I don't know of footage of the other ICE deaths, but maybe that's a bias at play.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    There's also the "one death is a tragedy, 100 deaths is a statistic" situation happening.

    Another factor is that these murders are breaking through to the folks that see the violence of arrests and raids and the deaths and injury of detainees more as a necessary cost. They can't justify these murders in their world view and they can empathize with them because they know these people did "nothing wrong" and were still killed. Maybe it could be them next?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    The big difference with the two recent ICE murders is that the video evidence:

    • Is graphic
    • Clearly shows no wrongdoing on the part of the victims
    • Shows sudden and completely unnecessary escalation to murder

    And they were both US citizens, so ICE has no jurisdiction. So it doesn't even matter if they were serial murderers—that's a police matter, not immigration. (And, obviously, being white and valued members of their communities matters, too.)

    Contrast that with:

    • The Canadian who died in custody because they were denied access to necessary life-saving medications has plausible deniability.
    • Many deaths by suicide in custody are "their fault" because they did it.
    • ICE shootings without video evidence could plausibly be self-defense.
    • Etc.

    Plus, they're (mostly) not American citizens, so ICE could have a legal reason to detain them "with force" for "resisting arrest" (or whatever they want to spin).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    For a long time the powers that be have played us against eachother with "them and us" tactics. When its 'them' dying its not a problem, they might have had it coming, its a 'them' thing. When they do it to 'us', recent converts realise one of two things ; [we were all us all along and they played me for a fool] or [they're coming after us too].

    Either way, they're now an ally. You can preach at them when this is over, and sort the 1st and 2nd kind apart at a more convenient time. Don't try and shame them for not coming onside sooner, it'll only create problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Yes, but at the same time, they do care about these 2, so we should use their names. Putting individual faces to the victims is powerful, but if we put 100 faces out there's they all get lost in the crowd and it stops feeling personal.

  • source
  • parent