That is true, but it doesn't mean the person you originally replied to is wrong. What they said is also true. Presenting what you did as a counterargument makes no sense.

Texas has been murdering people over it.

I don't know.

Which world is a vasectomy and tubal ligation the same as an abortion? Because that was the comment that I responded to.

The topic was illegal procedures, the person I replied to was comparing a vasectomy to abortion by asking which states it is illegal in.

The comparison isn’t valid. A vasectomy isn’t remotely the same procedure as an abortion.

Well I don’t know

You could check before posting so that you would know.

If you did, you would find out that there are 0 states in the United States where either tubal ligation or vasectomies are illegal.

I do agree that the access to care situation is shit and caused by sexist lawmakers and doctors.

But, just because you agree with someone, doesn’t mean you can’t tell them that they’re making irrational arguments. If people want to continue to push for change, it’s important that everyone is capable of understanding the issues and know how to argue them effectively.

Making outrage baiting statements are good for social media engagement, but they’re antithetical to convincing people to change.

No, this is very different than that. This is about supporting one group without intentionally putting down another.

If someone posted "white women's rights don't vary state by state, but black women's do", they would rightfully be called out for posting nonsense. But you'd be there saying "no but black women have it worse tho" That's the equivalent. It's a clearly false statement intended to make one group an enemy instead of an ally and you shouldn't be defending it so blindly

The message "black lives matter" was intentionally amplified to sow dissent along racial lines.