you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

If the artist did something heinous, I would say take the art and then forget the artist's name. Make it common use, and no need to attribute the name of the artist to the art. Give it a pseudonym if need be, assign a random name to the piece, and let the actual artist's name fade away.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Oooh, that's huge. I would feel way better if the artist was no longer receiving royalties or payment, and the state or the marginalized group got the funds instead.

  • source
  • parent