▲ 1326 ▼ Pika Pika (mander.xyz) submitted 11 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 102 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 98 points 11 months ago (18 children) Pika is a real animal? Gen 1 pokemon really are just funny colored real animals. permalink fedilink source hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 91 points 11 months ago “Ekans” is just “Snake” spelled backwards. “Muk” is just…oh, oh god permalink fedilink source parent [–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 26 points 11 months ago (9 children) Pika is pronounced "pie-kuh" generally. Pikachu comes from pika pika (japanese onomatopoeia for "sparking/sparkling" usually with the connotation of clean) + chuu (sound a mouse makes/squeak). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago (8 children) Actually it comes from pika(-tto), the onomatopoeia for a lightning strike. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Actually, name of many Pokemon are multi layered So there is no wrong, but both right It is the beauty of Pokemon names and even concepts Watch some lockstin and gnoggin if interested in this topic 😇 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Yeah I just think it's kind of neat how the names of English pokemon are formed in a similar way to how they are in Japanese. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cintari@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (3 children) Not according to an interview by the creator of Pikachu, Atsuko Nishida: “Since it was an Electric-type Pokémon, I thought ‘pika‘ [the expression of light flashing in Japanese]. https://web.archive.org/web/20211108083831/https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-news/creator-profile-the-creators-of-pikachu/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (2 children) That’s… what I said? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] embed_me@programming.dev 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Its light in general, not lightning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 1 point 11 months ago “pika” on its own is a sudden flash of light. This onomatopeia is very old (edo era old). What kind of light flashes do you think you’d find 400 years ago? There was pretty much just lightning. Not to be confused with the repeated “pika pika” which like the other commenter said indicates more of a glimmer or shiny and is way more common today. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) I think these are the same root? Pika pika is used to mean clean but it's onomatopoeia for sparkling. That double word onomatopoeia construction in japanese doesn't really have a direct analogue in English I don't think. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stray@pawb.social 1 point 11 months ago They're the same. The "pika" is from "hika", which refers to light. permalink fedilink source parent [–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (2 children) Voltorb, Muk, Magnemite, and Mr Mime would all like a word with you. Jynx, however, doesn't mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) brotlov? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago Oh they brought a lot of love alright permalink fedilink source parent [–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) Wtf is a Glumanda? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_salamander permalink fedilink source parent [–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago* Confusingly, there is the animal in the post that is commonly called pika (Ochotona daurica). What I had to think of first was Pica pica though (the Eurasian magpie) permalink fedilink source parent [–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago Bigger lens is better for wildlife photography and long distance shot. Animals scurry away when you try to get close, so it's best to take a picture from the distance. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 91 points 11 months ago “Ekans” is just “Snake” spelled backwards. “Muk” is just…oh, oh god permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 26 points 11 months ago (9 children) Pika is pronounced "pie-kuh" generally. Pikachu comes from pika pika (japanese onomatopoeia for "sparking/sparkling" usually with the connotation of clean) + chuu (sound a mouse makes/squeak). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago (8 children) Actually it comes from pika(-tto), the onomatopoeia for a lightning strike. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Actually, name of many Pokemon are multi layered So there is no wrong, but both right It is the beauty of Pokemon names and even concepts Watch some lockstin and gnoggin if interested in this topic 😇 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Yeah I just think it's kind of neat how the names of English pokemon are formed in a similar way to how they are in Japanese. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cintari@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (3 children) Not according to an interview by the creator of Pikachu, Atsuko Nishida: “Since it was an Electric-type Pokémon, I thought ‘pika‘ [the expression of light flashing in Japanese]. https://web.archive.org/web/20211108083831/https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-news/creator-profile-the-creators-of-pikachu/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (2 children) That’s… what I said? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] embed_me@programming.dev 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Its light in general, not lightning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 1 point 11 months ago “pika” on its own is a sudden flash of light. This onomatopeia is very old (edo era old). What kind of light flashes do you think you’d find 400 years ago? There was pretty much just lightning. Not to be confused with the repeated “pika pika” which like the other commenter said indicates more of a glimmer or shiny and is way more common today. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) I think these are the same root? Pika pika is used to mean clean but it's onomatopoeia for sparkling. That double word onomatopoeia construction in japanese doesn't really have a direct analogue in English I don't think. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stray@pawb.social 1 point 11 months ago They're the same. The "pika" is from "hika", which refers to light. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago (8 children) Actually it comes from pika(-tto), the onomatopoeia for a lightning strike. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Actually, name of many Pokemon are multi layered So there is no wrong, but both right It is the beauty of Pokemon names and even concepts Watch some lockstin and gnoggin if interested in this topic 😇 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Yeah I just think it's kind of neat how the names of English pokemon are formed in a similar way to how they are in Japanese. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cintari@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (3 children) Not according to an interview by the creator of Pikachu, Atsuko Nishida: “Since it was an Electric-type Pokémon, I thought ‘pika‘ [the expression of light flashing in Japanese]. https://web.archive.org/web/20211108083831/https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-news/creator-profile-the-creators-of-pikachu/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (2 children) That’s… what I said? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] embed_me@programming.dev 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Its light in general, not lightning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 1 point 11 months ago “pika” on its own is a sudden flash of light. This onomatopeia is very old (edo era old). What kind of light flashes do you think you’d find 400 years ago? There was pretty much just lightning. Not to be confused with the repeated “pika pika” which like the other commenter said indicates more of a glimmer or shiny and is way more common today. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) I think these are the same root? Pika pika is used to mean clean but it's onomatopoeia for sparkling. That double word onomatopoeia construction in japanese doesn't really have a direct analogue in English I don't think. permalink fedilink source parent [–] stray@pawb.social 1 point 11 months ago They're the same. The "pika" is from "hika", which refers to light. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Actually, name of many Pokemon are multi layered So there is no wrong, but both right It is the beauty of Pokemon names and even concepts Watch some lockstin and gnoggin if interested in this topic 😇 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Yeah I just think it's kind of neat how the names of English pokemon are formed in a similar way to how they are in Japanese. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Yeah I just think it's kind of neat how the names of English pokemon are formed in a similar way to how they are in Japanese. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cintari@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (3 children) Not according to an interview by the creator of Pikachu, Atsuko Nishida: “Since it was an Electric-type Pokémon, I thought ‘pika‘ [the expression of light flashing in Japanese]. https://web.archive.org/web/20211108083831/https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-news/creator-profile-the-creators-of-pikachu/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (2 children) That’s… what I said? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] embed_me@programming.dev 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Its light in general, not lightning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 1 point 11 months ago “pika” on its own is a sudden flash of light. This onomatopeia is very old (edo era old). What kind of light flashes do you think you’d find 400 years ago? There was pretty much just lightning. Not to be confused with the repeated “pika pika” which like the other commenter said indicates more of a glimmer or shiny and is way more common today. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (2 children) That’s… what I said? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] embed_me@programming.dev 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Its light in general, not lightning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 1 point 11 months ago “pika” on its own is a sudden flash of light. This onomatopeia is very old (edo era old). What kind of light flashes do you think you’d find 400 years ago? There was pretty much just lightning. Not to be confused with the repeated “pika pika” which like the other commenter said indicates more of a glimmer or shiny and is way more common today. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] embed_me@programming.dev 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Its light in general, not lightning permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 1 point 11 months ago “pika” on its own is a sudden flash of light. This onomatopeia is very old (edo era old). What kind of light flashes do you think you’d find 400 years ago? There was pretty much just lightning. Not to be confused with the repeated “pika pika” which like the other commenter said indicates more of a glimmer or shiny and is way more common today. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 1 point 11 months ago “pika” on its own is a sudden flash of light. This onomatopeia is very old (edo era old). What kind of light flashes do you think you’d find 400 years ago? There was pretty much just lightning. Not to be confused with the repeated “pika pika” which like the other commenter said indicates more of a glimmer or shiny and is way more common today. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) I think these are the same root? Pika pika is used to mean clean but it's onomatopoeia for sparkling. That double word onomatopoeia construction in japanese doesn't really have a direct analogue in English I don't think. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stray@pawb.social 1 point 11 months ago They're the same. The "pika" is from "hika", which refers to light. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (2 children) Voltorb, Muk, Magnemite, and Mr Mime would all like a word with you. Jynx, however, doesn't mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) brotlov? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago Oh they brought a lot of love alright permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) brotlov? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago Oh they brought a lot of love alright permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago Oh they brought a lot of love alright permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) Wtf is a Glumanda? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_salamander permalink fedilink source parent
[–] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_salamander permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago* Confusingly, there is the animal in the post that is commonly called pika (Ochotona daurica). What I had to think of first was Pica pica though (the Eurasian magpie) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago Bigger lens is better for wildlife photography and long distance shot. Animals scurry away when you try to get close, so it's best to take a picture from the distance. permalink fedilink source parent