you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 11 months ago (10 children)

and then points out that it's scientifically inaccurate

by quoting noted transphobe, Richard Dawkins lmao.

Why are you so focused on spreading transphobic rhetoric?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 11 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    I think Richard Dawkins is a transphobe because he frequently makes public anti-trans statements and conflates gender and sex in a way that is weaponized against trans people.

    If you think acknowledging scientific truth is transphobic, that's entirely on you.

    Jesus dude this is just boring now. Claiming your outdated view is "scientific truth" hasn't worked all day, maybe find a new slant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 11 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    It doesn't matter what arguments I give you, you're dug in. That's what's boring - every new angle anyone tries with you just gets the same old tired "my science is correct and infallible, yours is wrong" response. "Arguments" like that are boring. 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 11 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Are you serious? Like, you can't be serious at this point. I sent that article to you, like 4 comments ago. We've already discussed it, in this very thread. 🥱

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    No, I still don't agree with the same incorrect bullshit you've been saying for the past 36 hours now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments