you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 11 months ago (12 children)

Golf uses a fuck ton of water and land. It's not great either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Both of those may not be a big concern, depending on the situation.

    Land availability in North America is not really a concern; there's a shit ton of land available. When cities expand and the golf course's land value goes way up, the course tends to get sold off.

    Water use also is a case of "it depends". If the the course is using aquifer water, yes that's a big problem. Many, if not most, don't use aquifer water. In the wetter climates, most are using water pumped from rainwater fed holding ponds, or other lakes, rivers, etc on the property. Even in Arizona, most courses are using treated grey water, keeping them from contributing to any water shortages.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    When cities expand and the golf course's land value goes way up, the course tends to get sold off.

    Do they? All the courses that I remember being on the edge of towns and cities just had the city grow around them as the increase in customers made up for the increased ownership costs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    but both are equally bad.

    Asphalt, petrol, oil, and tires are equally bad to watering grass so old men can drive electric carts around?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Golf courses are estimated to take up ~0.1% of all US land. Yes, a square mile of F1 track is worse than a square mile of golf course, but we're talking probably 1000x difference in scale.

  • source
  • parent