you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 70 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Guaranteed this gets hung up in Senate, on Trump's desk or because of the DOJ's 'investigation' and they try to never release it.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I'd like to buy the "blocked by on-going investigation" square, please. It's so obvious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That was basically his excuse with his tax returns right? I wouldn't be shocked in the least if this is his next move

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Yeah but he was lying about that completely, there was no "audit". He didn't want people to know how much of a tax cheat he is. Now he has the power (he shouldn't but sadly does) to start an actual DOJ investigation. We'll see.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I have to print all new bingo cards AGAIN?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I think it's more likely that they'll just release all the files except for those which mention Trump and his allies, or edit out such references and pass it off as the genuine article.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, my guess is either they found a different way to never release anything, or they'll pass some random junk as the files in question. That's the reason Johnson suddenly changed his mind on allowing the House to do their job, and why Republicans voted yes on the bill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I did hear an NPR interview with Ro Khanna (member of Congress representing California 17, discharge petition signatory) today, where whether he had concerns about the authenticity of the files to be released, and he did say that he did. When asked further how he could be sure that the files so released are complete and accurate, he said that it would be dumb to attempt a cover-up or incomplete release, because many of the victims' lawyers have already seen the files and thus would know if the released files are incomplete, inaccurate, or inauthentic.

    That being said, I do not expect Trump and his crack(pot) team of advisers to have the metal acuity to judge the probability of a successful cover-up correctly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I thought the same but amazingly the Senate passed it easily. Trump says he'll sign it. We'll see.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    He will. The wording of the language is that they release anything unclassified... So then Bondi classifies everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    If you've seen what was in the last batch of Epstein emails/texts, it shouldn't be a surprise. That's the shit they leaked? What are they holding back? My god, how many Obama staffers was Epstein buddies with? How many Israeli MPs? Put the whole of Lower Manhattan and half the Hamptons on the god damned sex offender registry. Dude was everywhere.

    The man is absolutely radioactive. Never even mind the Republicans, there's zero chance Chuck Schumer wants anything else getting released. Epstein could bring down everyone in DC over 70.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    there’s zero chance Chuck Schumer wants anything else getting released

    His voting says otherwise. What utter bullshit. You can literally say anything about him and then just demand people accept as true. Sound familiar?

    My god, how many Obama staffers was Epstein buddies with?

    Why the fuck would Republicans want to hold that back?

  • source
  • parent