▲ 400 ▼ OpenAI says over a million people talk to ChatGPT about suicide weekly (techcrunch.com) submitted 1 year ago by cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 132 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 227 points 1 year ago (43 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 43 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 year ago (34 children) Still, what are they gonna do to a million suicidal people besides ignore them entirely permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 34 child comments replies: [+] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago It’s never the drugs I want though :( permalink fedilink source parent [–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, no. They want repeat customers! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (21 children) Well, AI therapy is more likely to harm their mental health, up to encouraging suicide (as certain cases have already shown). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 8 points 1 year ago There's evidence that a lot of suicide hotlines can be just as bad. You hear awful stories all the time of overwhelmed or fed up operators taking it out on the caller. There's some real evil people out there. And not everyone has access to a dedicated therapist who wants to help. permalink fedilink source parent [–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Over the long term I have significant hopes for AI talk therapy, at least for some uses. Two opportunities stand out that might have potential: In some cases I think people will talk to a soulless robot more freely than to a human professional. Machine learning systems are good at pattern recognition and this is one component of diagnosis. This meta analysis found that LLM models performed about as accurately as physicians, with the exception of expert-level specialists. In time I think it’s undeniable that there is potential here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Suicide is big business. There's infrastructure readily available to reap financial rewards from the activity, atleast in the US. permalink fedilink source parent [–] atmorous@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) More so from corporate proprietary ones no? At least I hope that's the only cases. The open source ones suggest really useful ways proprietary do not. Now I dont rely on open source AI but they are definitely better permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago The corporate models are actually much better at it due to having heavy filtering built in. The fact that a model generally encourages self arm is just a lie that you can prove right now by pretending to be suicidal on ChatGPT. You will see it will adamantly push you to seek help. The filters and safety nets can be bypassed no matter how hard you make them, and it is the reason why we got some unfortunate news. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (15 children) Real therapy isn’t always better. At least there you can get drugs. But neither are a guarantee to make life better—and for a lot of them, life isn’t going to get better anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (10 children) Are you comparing a professional to a text generator? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (9 children) Have you ever had ineffective professional therapy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (8 children) Are you still trying to compare medical treatment with generating text? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -7 points 1 year ago (7 children) Compare, as in equal? No. You can’t “game” a person (usually) like you can game an AI. Now, answer my question permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) No, comparing as in comparing apples and oranges. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Answer my question, or just admit you refuse to engage in conversation and we can depart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is no conversation to be had here, because you have no point. A text generator is not someone you talk to, it's a thing that takes your input and then outputs the text that is most likely relevant to said input. No reasoning. No knowledge. Taking the example made in one of the other comments here, you could paint a face to a ball and keep yourself mentally stable on a desert island, but the ball isn't doing anything, there's only you on the island. Apply that to getting mental help from an LLM and you'll see how creepy it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) what you are describing is called a Markov chain, not a large language model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It’s pretty difficult to prove my point when you refuse to have a conversation. What you want is to just get your dopamine by criticizing others instead of allowing them to argue their point. So you are right, there is no conversation to be had here because you are not willing to engage in a conversation. I wish you the best in your therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Real therapy is definitely better than an AI. That said, AIs will never encourage self harm without significant gaming. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago AI “therapy” can be very effective without the gaming, but the problem is most people want it to tell them what they want to hear. Real therapy is not “fun” because a therapist will challenge you on your bullshit and not let you shape the conversation. I find it does a pretty good job with pro and con lists, listing out several options, and taking situations and reframing them. I have found it very useful, but I have learned not to manipulate it or its advice just becomes me convincing myself of a thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) I agree, and to the comment above you, it's not because it's guaranteed to reduce symptoms. There are many ways that talking with another person is good for us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago The keyword here is "person". permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) My pet theory: Radicalize the disenfranchised to incite domestic terrorism and further OpenAI's political goals. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) What are their political goals? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Tax breaks for tech bros permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago I think total control over the country might be the goal, and it’s a bit more than a tax break. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I feel like if thats 1 mill peeps wanting to die... They could say join a revolution to say take back our free government? Or make it more free? Shower thoughts. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Strap explosives to their chests and send them to thier competitors? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Convince each one that they alone are the chosen one to assassinate grok and that this mission is all that matters to give their lives meaning. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago Take that Grok!! permalink fedilink source parent [–] dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children) / permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago But they tell you that idea you had is great and worth pursuing! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] koshka@koshka.ynh.fr 5 points 1 year ago I don't understand why people dump such personal information into AI chats. None of it is protected. If they use chats for training data then it's not impossible that at some point the AI might tell someone enough to be identifiable or the AI could be manipulated into dumping its training data. I've overshared more than I should but I always keep in mind to remember that there's always a risk of chats getting leaked. Anything stored online can get leaked. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago But imagine the chances for your own business! Absolutely no one will steal your ideas before you can monetize them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) You have to decide, a few months ago everyone was blaming OpenAI for not doing anything permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago Definitely a case where you can't resolve conflicting interests to everyone's satisfaction. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 year ago (34 children) Still, what are they gonna do to a million suicidal people besides ignore them entirely permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 34 child comments replies: [+] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago It’s never the drugs I want though :( permalink fedilink source parent [–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, no. They want repeat customers! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (21 children) Well, AI therapy is more likely to harm their mental health, up to encouraging suicide (as certain cases have already shown). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 8 points 1 year ago There's evidence that a lot of suicide hotlines can be just as bad. You hear awful stories all the time of overwhelmed or fed up operators taking it out on the caller. There's some real evil people out there. And not everyone has access to a dedicated therapist who wants to help. permalink fedilink source parent [–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Over the long term I have significant hopes for AI talk therapy, at least for some uses. Two opportunities stand out that might have potential: In some cases I think people will talk to a soulless robot more freely than to a human professional. Machine learning systems are good at pattern recognition and this is one component of diagnosis. This meta analysis found that LLM models performed about as accurately as physicians, with the exception of expert-level specialists. In time I think it’s undeniable that there is potential here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Suicide is big business. There's infrastructure readily available to reap financial rewards from the activity, atleast in the US. permalink fedilink source parent [–] atmorous@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) More so from corporate proprietary ones no? At least I hope that's the only cases. The open source ones suggest really useful ways proprietary do not. Now I dont rely on open source AI but they are definitely better permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago The corporate models are actually much better at it due to having heavy filtering built in. The fact that a model generally encourages self arm is just a lie that you can prove right now by pretending to be suicidal on ChatGPT. You will see it will adamantly push you to seek help. The filters and safety nets can be bypassed no matter how hard you make them, and it is the reason why we got some unfortunate news. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (15 children) Real therapy isn’t always better. At least there you can get drugs. But neither are a guarantee to make life better—and for a lot of them, life isn’t going to get better anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (10 children) Are you comparing a professional to a text generator? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (9 children) Have you ever had ineffective professional therapy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (8 children) Are you still trying to compare medical treatment with generating text? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -7 points 1 year ago (7 children) Compare, as in equal? No. You can’t “game” a person (usually) like you can game an AI. Now, answer my question permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) No, comparing as in comparing apples and oranges. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Answer my question, or just admit you refuse to engage in conversation and we can depart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is no conversation to be had here, because you have no point. A text generator is not someone you talk to, it's a thing that takes your input and then outputs the text that is most likely relevant to said input. No reasoning. No knowledge. Taking the example made in one of the other comments here, you could paint a face to a ball and keep yourself mentally stable on a desert island, but the ball isn't doing anything, there's only you on the island. Apply that to getting mental help from an LLM and you'll see how creepy it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) what you are describing is called a Markov chain, not a large language model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It’s pretty difficult to prove my point when you refuse to have a conversation. What you want is to just get your dopamine by criticizing others instead of allowing them to argue their point. So you are right, there is no conversation to be had here because you are not willing to engage in a conversation. I wish you the best in your therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Real therapy is definitely better than an AI. That said, AIs will never encourage self harm without significant gaming. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago AI “therapy” can be very effective without the gaming, but the problem is most people want it to tell them what they want to hear. Real therapy is not “fun” because a therapist will challenge you on your bullshit and not let you shape the conversation. I find it does a pretty good job with pro and con lists, listing out several options, and taking situations and reframing them. I have found it very useful, but I have learned not to manipulate it or its advice just becomes me convincing myself of a thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) I agree, and to the comment above you, it's not because it's guaranteed to reduce symptoms. There are many ways that talking with another person is good for us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago The keyword here is "person". permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) My pet theory: Radicalize the disenfranchised to incite domestic terrorism and further OpenAI's political goals. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) What are their political goals? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Tax breaks for tech bros permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago I think total control over the country might be the goal, and it’s a bit more than a tax break. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I feel like if thats 1 mill peeps wanting to die... They could say join a revolution to say take back our free government? Or make it more free? Shower thoughts. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Strap explosives to their chests and send them to thier competitors? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Convince each one that they alone are the chosen one to assassinate grok and that this mission is all that matters to give their lives meaning. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago Take that Grok!! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago It’s never the drugs I want though :( permalink fedilink source parent [–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, no. They want repeat customers! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago It’s never the drugs I want though :( permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, no. They want repeat customers! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (21 children) Well, AI therapy is more likely to harm their mental health, up to encouraging suicide (as certain cases have already shown). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 8 points 1 year ago There's evidence that a lot of suicide hotlines can be just as bad. You hear awful stories all the time of overwhelmed or fed up operators taking it out on the caller. There's some real evil people out there. And not everyone has access to a dedicated therapist who wants to help. permalink fedilink source parent [–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Over the long term I have significant hopes for AI talk therapy, at least for some uses. Two opportunities stand out that might have potential: In some cases I think people will talk to a soulless robot more freely than to a human professional. Machine learning systems are good at pattern recognition and this is one component of diagnosis. This meta analysis found that LLM models performed about as accurately as physicians, with the exception of expert-level specialists. In time I think it’s undeniable that there is potential here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Suicide is big business. There's infrastructure readily available to reap financial rewards from the activity, atleast in the US. permalink fedilink source parent [–] atmorous@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) More so from corporate proprietary ones no? At least I hope that's the only cases. The open source ones suggest really useful ways proprietary do not. Now I dont rely on open source AI but they are definitely better permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago The corporate models are actually much better at it due to having heavy filtering built in. The fact that a model generally encourages self arm is just a lie that you can prove right now by pretending to be suicidal on ChatGPT. You will see it will adamantly push you to seek help. The filters and safety nets can be bypassed no matter how hard you make them, and it is the reason why we got some unfortunate news. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (15 children) Real therapy isn’t always better. At least there you can get drugs. But neither are a guarantee to make life better—and for a lot of them, life isn’t going to get better anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (10 children) Are you comparing a professional to a text generator? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (9 children) Have you ever had ineffective professional therapy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (8 children) Are you still trying to compare medical treatment with generating text? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -7 points 1 year ago (7 children) Compare, as in equal? No. You can’t “game” a person (usually) like you can game an AI. Now, answer my question permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) No, comparing as in comparing apples and oranges. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Answer my question, or just admit you refuse to engage in conversation and we can depart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is no conversation to be had here, because you have no point. A text generator is not someone you talk to, it's a thing that takes your input and then outputs the text that is most likely relevant to said input. No reasoning. No knowledge. Taking the example made in one of the other comments here, you could paint a face to a ball and keep yourself mentally stable on a desert island, but the ball isn't doing anything, there's only you on the island. Apply that to getting mental help from an LLM and you'll see how creepy it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) what you are describing is called a Markov chain, not a large language model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It’s pretty difficult to prove my point when you refuse to have a conversation. What you want is to just get your dopamine by criticizing others instead of allowing them to argue their point. So you are right, there is no conversation to be had here because you are not willing to engage in a conversation. I wish you the best in your therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Real therapy is definitely better than an AI. That said, AIs will never encourage self harm without significant gaming. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago AI “therapy” can be very effective without the gaming, but the problem is most people want it to tell them what they want to hear. Real therapy is not “fun” because a therapist will challenge you on your bullshit and not let you shape the conversation. I find it does a pretty good job with pro and con lists, listing out several options, and taking situations and reframing them. I have found it very useful, but I have learned not to manipulate it or its advice just becomes me convincing myself of a thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) I agree, and to the comment above you, it's not because it's guaranteed to reduce symptoms. There are many ways that talking with another person is good for us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago The keyword here is "person". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 8 points 1 year ago There's evidence that a lot of suicide hotlines can be just as bad. You hear awful stories all the time of overwhelmed or fed up operators taking it out on the caller. There's some real evil people out there. And not everyone has access to a dedicated therapist who wants to help. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Over the long term I have significant hopes for AI talk therapy, at least for some uses. Two opportunities stand out that might have potential: In some cases I think people will talk to a soulless robot more freely than to a human professional. Machine learning systems are good at pattern recognition and this is one component of diagnosis. This meta analysis found that LLM models performed about as accurately as physicians, with the exception of expert-level specialists. In time I think it’s undeniable that there is potential here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Suicide is big business. There's infrastructure readily available to reap financial rewards from the activity, atleast in the US. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] atmorous@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) More so from corporate proprietary ones no? At least I hope that's the only cases. The open source ones suggest really useful ways proprietary do not. Now I dont rely on open source AI but they are definitely better permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago The corporate models are actually much better at it due to having heavy filtering built in. The fact that a model generally encourages self arm is just a lie that you can prove right now by pretending to be suicidal on ChatGPT. You will see it will adamantly push you to seek help. The filters and safety nets can be bypassed no matter how hard you make them, and it is the reason why we got some unfortunate news. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago The corporate models are actually much better at it due to having heavy filtering built in. The fact that a model generally encourages self arm is just a lie that you can prove right now by pretending to be suicidal on ChatGPT. You will see it will adamantly push you to seek help. The filters and safety nets can be bypassed no matter how hard you make them, and it is the reason why we got some unfortunate news. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (15 children) Real therapy isn’t always better. At least there you can get drugs. But neither are a guarantee to make life better—and for a lot of them, life isn’t going to get better anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (10 children) Are you comparing a professional to a text generator? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (9 children) Have you ever had ineffective professional therapy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (8 children) Are you still trying to compare medical treatment with generating text? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -7 points 1 year ago (7 children) Compare, as in equal? No. You can’t “game” a person (usually) like you can game an AI. Now, answer my question permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) No, comparing as in comparing apples and oranges. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Answer my question, or just admit you refuse to engage in conversation and we can depart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is no conversation to be had here, because you have no point. A text generator is not someone you talk to, it's a thing that takes your input and then outputs the text that is most likely relevant to said input. No reasoning. No knowledge. Taking the example made in one of the other comments here, you could paint a face to a ball and keep yourself mentally stable on a desert island, but the ball isn't doing anything, there's only you on the island. Apply that to getting mental help from an LLM and you'll see how creepy it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) what you are describing is called a Markov chain, not a large language model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It’s pretty difficult to prove my point when you refuse to have a conversation. What you want is to just get your dopamine by criticizing others instead of allowing them to argue their point. So you are right, there is no conversation to be had here because you are not willing to engage in a conversation. I wish you the best in your therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Real therapy is definitely better than an AI. That said, AIs will never encourage self harm without significant gaming. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago AI “therapy” can be very effective without the gaming, but the problem is most people want it to tell them what they want to hear. Real therapy is not “fun” because a therapist will challenge you on your bullshit and not let you shape the conversation. I find it does a pretty good job with pro and con lists, listing out several options, and taking situations and reframing them. I have found it very useful, but I have learned not to manipulate it or its advice just becomes me convincing myself of a thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) I agree, and to the comment above you, it's not because it's guaranteed to reduce symptoms. There are many ways that talking with another person is good for us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago The keyword here is "person". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (10 children) Are you comparing a professional to a text generator? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (9 children) Have you ever had ineffective professional therapy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (8 children) Are you still trying to compare medical treatment with generating text? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -7 points 1 year ago (7 children) Compare, as in equal? No. You can’t “game” a person (usually) like you can game an AI. Now, answer my question permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) No, comparing as in comparing apples and oranges. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Answer my question, or just admit you refuse to engage in conversation and we can depart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is no conversation to be had here, because you have no point. A text generator is not someone you talk to, it's a thing that takes your input and then outputs the text that is most likely relevant to said input. No reasoning. No knowledge. Taking the example made in one of the other comments here, you could paint a face to a ball and keep yourself mentally stable on a desert island, but the ball isn't doing anything, there's only you on the island. Apply that to getting mental help from an LLM and you'll see how creepy it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) what you are describing is called a Markov chain, not a large language model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It’s pretty difficult to prove my point when you refuse to have a conversation. What you want is to just get your dopamine by criticizing others instead of allowing them to argue their point. So you are right, there is no conversation to be had here because you are not willing to engage in a conversation. I wish you the best in your therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (9 children) Have you ever had ineffective professional therapy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (8 children) Are you still trying to compare medical treatment with generating text? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -7 points 1 year ago (7 children) Compare, as in equal? No. You can’t “game” a person (usually) like you can game an AI. Now, answer my question permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) No, comparing as in comparing apples and oranges. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Answer my question, or just admit you refuse to engage in conversation and we can depart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is no conversation to be had here, because you have no point. A text generator is not someone you talk to, it's a thing that takes your input and then outputs the text that is most likely relevant to said input. No reasoning. No knowledge. Taking the example made in one of the other comments here, you could paint a face to a ball and keep yourself mentally stable on a desert island, but the ball isn't doing anything, there's only you on the island. Apply that to getting mental help from an LLM and you'll see how creepy it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) what you are describing is called a Markov chain, not a large language model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It’s pretty difficult to prove my point when you refuse to have a conversation. What you want is to just get your dopamine by criticizing others instead of allowing them to argue their point. So you are right, there is no conversation to be had here because you are not willing to engage in a conversation. I wish you the best in your therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (8 children) Are you still trying to compare medical treatment with generating text? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -7 points 1 year ago (7 children) Compare, as in equal? No. You can’t “game” a person (usually) like you can game an AI. Now, answer my question permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) No, comparing as in comparing apples and oranges. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Answer my question, or just admit you refuse to engage in conversation and we can depart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is no conversation to be had here, because you have no point. A text generator is not someone you talk to, it's a thing that takes your input and then outputs the text that is most likely relevant to said input. No reasoning. No knowledge. Taking the example made in one of the other comments here, you could paint a face to a ball and keep yourself mentally stable on a desert island, but the ball isn't doing anything, there's only you on the island. Apply that to getting mental help from an LLM and you'll see how creepy it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) what you are describing is called a Markov chain, not a large language model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It’s pretty difficult to prove my point when you refuse to have a conversation. What you want is to just get your dopamine by criticizing others instead of allowing them to argue their point. So you are right, there is no conversation to be had here because you are not willing to engage in a conversation. I wish you the best in your therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -7 points 1 year ago (7 children) Compare, as in equal? No. You can’t “game” a person (usually) like you can game an AI. Now, answer my question permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) No, comparing as in comparing apples and oranges. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Answer my question, or just admit you refuse to engage in conversation and we can depart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is no conversation to be had here, because you have no point. A text generator is not someone you talk to, it's a thing that takes your input and then outputs the text that is most likely relevant to said input. No reasoning. No knowledge. Taking the example made in one of the other comments here, you could paint a face to a ball and keep yourself mentally stable on a desert island, but the ball isn't doing anything, there's only you on the island. Apply that to getting mental help from an LLM and you'll see how creepy it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) what you are describing is called a Markov chain, not a large language model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It’s pretty difficult to prove my point when you refuse to have a conversation. What you want is to just get your dopamine by criticizing others instead of allowing them to argue their point. So you are right, there is no conversation to be had here because you are not willing to engage in a conversation. I wish you the best in your therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) No, comparing as in comparing apples and oranges. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Answer my question, or just admit you refuse to engage in conversation and we can depart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is no conversation to be had here, because you have no point. A text generator is not someone you talk to, it's a thing that takes your input and then outputs the text that is most likely relevant to said input. No reasoning. No knowledge. Taking the example made in one of the other comments here, you could paint a face to a ball and keep yourself mentally stable on a desert island, but the ball isn't doing anything, there's only you on the island. Apply that to getting mental help from an LLM and you'll see how creepy it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) what you are describing is called a Markov chain, not a large language model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It’s pretty difficult to prove my point when you refuse to have a conversation. What you want is to just get your dopamine by criticizing others instead of allowing them to argue their point. So you are right, there is no conversation to be had here because you are not willing to engage in a conversation. I wish you the best in your therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Answer my question, or just admit you refuse to engage in conversation and we can depart permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is no conversation to be had here, because you have no point. A text generator is not someone you talk to, it's a thing that takes your input and then outputs the text that is most likely relevant to said input. No reasoning. No knowledge. Taking the example made in one of the other comments here, you could paint a face to a ball and keep yourself mentally stable on a desert island, but the ball isn't doing anything, there's only you on the island. Apply that to getting mental help from an LLM and you'll see how creepy it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) what you are describing is called a Markov chain, not a large language model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It’s pretty difficult to prove my point when you refuse to have a conversation. What you want is to just get your dopamine by criticizing others instead of allowing them to argue their point. So you are right, there is no conversation to be had here because you are not willing to engage in a conversation. I wish you the best in your therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is no conversation to be had here, because you have no point. A text generator is not someone you talk to, it's a thing that takes your input and then outputs the text that is most likely relevant to said input. No reasoning. No knowledge. Taking the example made in one of the other comments here, you could paint a face to a ball and keep yourself mentally stable on a desert island, but the ball isn't doing anything, there's only you on the island. Apply that to getting mental help from an LLM and you'll see how creepy it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) what you are describing is called a Markov chain, not a large language model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It’s pretty difficult to prove my point when you refuse to have a conversation. What you want is to just get your dopamine by criticizing others instead of allowing them to argue their point. So you are right, there is no conversation to be had here because you are not willing to engage in a conversation. I wish you the best in your therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) what you are describing is called a Markov chain, not a large language model. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Totally another thing, since we are talking about language here. But feel free to join the other guy in talking to your screen. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It’s pretty difficult to prove my point when you refuse to have a conversation. What you want is to just get your dopamine by criticizing others instead of allowing them to argue their point. So you are right, there is no conversation to be had here because you are not willing to engage in a conversation. I wish you the best in your therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago I wish you the best in talking to the calculator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Real therapy is definitely better than an AI. That said, AIs will never encourage self harm without significant gaming. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago AI “therapy” can be very effective without the gaming, but the problem is most people want it to tell them what they want to hear. Real therapy is not “fun” because a therapist will challenge you on your bullshit and not let you shape the conversation. I find it does a pretty good job with pro and con lists, listing out several options, and taking situations and reframing them. I have found it very useful, but I have learned not to manipulate it or its advice just becomes me convincing myself of a thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) I agree, and to the comment above you, it's not because it's guaranteed to reduce symptoms. There are many ways that talking with another person is good for us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago The keyword here is "person". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago AI “therapy” can be very effective without the gaming, but the problem is most people want it to tell them what they want to hear. Real therapy is not “fun” because a therapist will challenge you on your bullshit and not let you shape the conversation. I find it does a pretty good job with pro and con lists, listing out several options, and taking situations and reframing them. I have found it very useful, but I have learned not to manipulate it or its advice just becomes me convincing myself of a thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) I agree, and to the comment above you, it's not because it's guaranteed to reduce symptoms. There are many ways that talking with another person is good for us. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago The keyword here is "person". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago The keyword here is "person". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) My pet theory: Radicalize the disenfranchised to incite domestic terrorism and further OpenAI's political goals. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) What are their political goals? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Tax breaks for tech bros permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago I think total control over the country might be the goal, and it’s a bit more than a tax break. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) What are their political goals? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Tax breaks for tech bros permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago I think total control over the country might be the goal, and it’s a bit more than a tax break. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Tax breaks for tech bros permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago I think total control over the country might be the goal, and it’s a bit more than a tax break. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago I think total control over the country might be the goal, and it’s a bit more than a tax break. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I feel like if thats 1 mill peeps wanting to die... They could say join a revolution to say take back our free government? Or make it more free? Shower thoughts. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Strap explosives to their chests and send them to thier competitors? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Convince each one that they alone are the chosen one to assassinate grok and that this mission is all that matters to give their lives meaning. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago Take that Grok!! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Convince each one that they alone are the chosen one to assassinate grok and that this mission is all that matters to give their lives meaning. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children) / permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago But they tell you that idea you had is great and worth pursuing! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago But they tell you that idea you had is great and worth pursuing! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] koshka@koshka.ynh.fr 5 points 1 year ago I don't understand why people dump such personal information into AI chats. None of it is protected. If they use chats for training data then it's not impossible that at some point the AI might tell someone enough to be identifiable or the AI could be manipulated into dumping its training data. I've overshared more than I should but I always keep in mind to remember that there's always a risk of chats getting leaked. Anything stored online can get leaked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago But imagine the chances for your own business! Absolutely no one will steal your ideas before you can monetize them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) You have to decide, a few months ago everyone was blaming OpenAI for not doing anything permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago Definitely a case where you can't resolve conflicting interests to everyone's satisfaction. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago Definitely a case where you can't resolve conflicting interests to everyone's satisfaction. permalink fedilink source parent