you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Yes, but we don’t have proof that universe can’t generate new matter.

True... we also don't have proof there isn't a tea pot orbiting our Sun since it's creation, either.

However, there's also a complete lack of evidence of it.

You cannot prove a negative. The evidence says no new matter can be created. No evidence that new matter gets created. Therefore, we work on the model of no new matter creation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    On these scales, the accuracy of our observations should reduce our confidence though. It doesn't make sense to confidently say that, in 200 trillion years there will be no stars, because our observations of the rate of new matter creation (approximately zero) have a margin of error which allows for there to still be some

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Until evidence shows otherwise, new matter being created doesnt fit our observations.

    Go prove that wrong! Win yourself a Nobel prize in physics! That's what science is about!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I do also want to point out that stuff like "The conservation of energy" law, in other words, that energy cannot be created or destroyed, does not hold for our universe with our current models. An expanding universe violates the time-translation symmetry

    This is our current models. This is what our current physics says. And we know it's incomplete.

    When it comes to scientific predictions, you always, always, need the caveat, "under our current model of".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    So if all the existing matter came from the big Bang, is it possible to condense it all back into one place?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    But in this case, this “theory” has a precedent. This energy and matter we have now must have come from somewhere. Whatever your personal belief on the matter is, what’s to say that event can’t happen again? If a god created the universe, then surely he can pump some more into it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Matter and energy can be converted. So, its possible it was never created, it just always was.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    That’s something I’ll never be able to understand. Something having no beginning. Just like I’ll never be able to understand a moment before the big bang, or at the moment of the singularity, where time did could not exist. If there’s no time, how can anything, like the big bang, happen? Unfortunately the singularity is something we know nothing about whatsoever, and probably will never know.

  • source
  • parent