you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I will argue this is not the problem. It's that vaccines were too good in their effectiveness. A victim of their own success.

The problem is not and has not been science. The problem is messaging.

This is the same reason why anti-vax is so popular, you think that's about science? It's idiots like RFK Jr and Trump have the ear of people. It's all messaging folks.

A person is smart. People are dumb.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    The problem is not and has not been science. The problem is messaging.

    Yes, but the actual factor driving this is the meteoric rise of the top 1% richest, it is wealth inequality that creates a coherence to misinformation by establishing systematic incentives. There have always been nebulous, destructive, cancer like forces of misinformation, it is as human as human can be but we aren't really fighting to transcend the pitfalls our own nature, we are fighting to get on the same page about the rich fucking us all over by artificially supercharging these tendencies within us for their own gain.

    It is irrational to just see this as an abstract conversation about the human brain's susceptibility to misinformation as it ignores the costly material operation being undertaken to manipulate us with said misinformation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    A person is smart. People are dumb.

    Well between the anti-vaxxers and any-vaxxers, the any-vaxxers won, by measure of how many took the jabs, believing "follow the science" without detecting an oxymoron.

    Beware the power of advertising and ignorance of epistemology.

  • source
  • parent