you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (60 children)

Nato terrorist suicide vehicles?

  • source
  • hideshow 60 child comments
  • [–] [S] 15 points 1 year ago* (59 children)

    American M113 APC vehicles retrofitted with RC controls and filled up with American explosives.

    In recent days, the IDF has significantly increased its use of explosive-laden armored personnel carriers (APCs), that are composed of older M113 models rigged with explosives, which can also be operated remotely, as part of preparations for a ground maneuver in the heart of Gaza City.

    https://www.jpost.com/defense-and-tech/article-866041

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 59 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] [S] 19 points 1 year ago (56 children)

    NATO vehicles. NATO bombs. NATO countries NATO supply chain. NATO funding.

    "NATO isn't doing this"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 56 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago (54 children)

    Is Turkey supporting the genocide? Iceland?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 54 child comments
  • [–] [S] 18 points 1 year ago (53 children)

    Yes.

    Turkey provides Israel with 30% of their gas.

    Iceland has this guy running free https://lemmy.world/post/35387057 and they are super racist. And they are probably investing money in Israel if I look it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 53 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago (49 children)

    Other countries are trading with israel too, russia, China and many more, they are all complicit in aiding the israel war machine, so is it still "nato"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 49 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (38 children)

    Whatabout russia and china is monumental cope

    Why cant you admit that nato is responsible and should be held responsible the same way as any other entity that did not discontinue weapons transfers to israel after the siege began?

    Oh its american mic weapons? Okay, nato is an american defense pact.

    Why are you trying to dismiss culpability as if European nations dont actively support and enable the genocide in the exact same material capacity as america? Take your lumps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago (37 children)

    It literally isn't "monumental cope" Israel imports more from China than any other country, helping to fund what they do.

    I can't admit nato is responsible because it's not, nato is a defensive pact, the countries that are part of nato are the problem, not the organization, it is also not "an American defense pact", there are many countries involved.

    I literally said some European countries are responsible? But if you want to go to "NATO" being responsible it's clearly china's fault, because they allow the Israeli capitalism to flourish, allowing Aipac to bribe the Americans (see how fucking stupid that sounds?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 37 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    These articles that disagree with me are clearly biased… against me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
    1. As if you’d actually read the articles.
    2. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it?
    3. Your media literacy could use improvement.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    NATO is not a defensive pact regardless of how much marketing campaigns (read: Western propaganda) is churned out. Look up what they did in Yugoslavia and Libya for good examples of their "defensiveness".

    Every single NATO country materially supports the settler-colony, regardless if they advertise it to be their genocide or not, no amount of "But china but russia but.." will change that. "Israel" is not a distinct state but an amalgamation of European (and more recently US and commonwealthian, whom hail from settler-colonies) settler-colonialist Zionazis occupying Palestine. Get that through your head.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Right, cause if if was offensive it would be invading other countries to steal their territory right? Funny that's what russia claims NATO does, but they are doing it themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    No it only sounds stupid when you say that china allows Israeli capitalism to thrive.

    Getting hung up on the descriptor of nato countries being responsible for arming and funding the genocide is a deliberate obfuscation and refusal to acknowledge that these countries coordinate their military intelligence/technology and are connected through nato. Nato isnt like the UN where it's some separate body from the member states, the member states ARE nato.

    i/e nato is responsible for supplying israel with weapons = america, France, germany, Britain, turkey, etc are supplying israel with weapons.

    If russia, brazil, china, and iran were funding Israeli genocide we would be saying "brics is funding genocide in gaza" and you would unironically accept that framing even though brics is itself an economic pact whereas nato is explicitly a military defense pact. It is a descriptor, used because spelling out all 32 nato nations who are complicit is a waste of time when you can just say "nato is responsible for these weapons being used against palestinians" and it conveys the exact same meaning to anyone who isnt a pedant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Wow, you actually went with "I know you are, but what am I?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    With the way you were acting, it was appropriate

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    In the Gaza genocide no. In the West Bank yes.

    You seem to avoid the point that these vehicle suicide bombs are 100% NATO funded and supplied.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    In both, the Gaza genocide and in the West Bank. These suice bombs aren't nato funded, just because the countries they originate from are some of natos members doesn't mean it's nato. Yes, the US Canada, England are funding the genocide, and providing equipment sure, but it's not NATO, Israel get funds it army through trade with hundreds of nations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    NATO countries with "military export bans" are sending F35 parts and other weapons including interceptors to Israel through the NATO logistics program.

    They are using NATO ports and NATO logistics to send their NATO weapons. And purchasing Israeli designed weapons for their own NATO military after Israel is done testing them on Palestinians in Gaza.

    There is one overarching factor making this genocide possible: NATO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    No they use their NATO logistics scheme to bypass military export bans and transport their weapons to America which then sends them to Israel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's the other way around, nato logistics is just military logistics that are shared across various countries, it's not nato, it's the countries themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    The NATO countries? Yeah it is them. Using the NATO chain to supply Israel. They could of course stop being complicit in the NATO genocide of Gaza. But they refuse.

    Not sure what the point here is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    You buy a gun from a store and ammo and then you kill someone, the arms company is responsable for your actions?

    Also dont mix up Amerikas actions with all of NATO

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes the arms company is responsible for selling you a gun when you are literally Adolf Hitler in the middle of the Holocaust.

    Also America and Europe are paying for the weapons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)