you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 1 year ago (15 children)

NATO is not a defensive pact regardless of how much marketing campaigns (read: Western propaganda) is churned out. Look up what they did in Yugoslavia and Libya for good examples of their "defensiveness".

Every single NATO country materially supports the settler-colony, regardless if they advertise it to be their genocide or not, no amount of "But china but russia but.." will change that. "Israel" is not a distinct state but an amalgamation of European (and more recently US and commonwealthian, whom hail from settler-colonies) settler-colonialist Zionazis occupying Palestine. Get that through your head.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Sounds like your just regurgitating anti nato propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Right, cause if if was offensive it would be invading other countries to steal their territory right? Funny that's what russia claims NATO does, but they are doing it themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    *Cause bombing civilians is defensive group would do

    Bombing civilians is bad, but they weren't just bombing civilians, they were preventing ethnic cleansing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments