▲ 17 ▼ [Video] Massive amounts of NATO terrorist suicide vehicles exploding in Palestinian neighborhood at night (files.catbox.moe) submitted 1 year ago by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/palestine@lemmy.ml 63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 19 points 1 year ago (56 children) NATO vehicles. NATO bombs. NATO countries NATO supply chain. NATO funding. "NATO isn't doing this" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 56 child comments replies: [–] Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 year ago “Hell nah bro, it’s all a coincidence, they’re not doing it on purpose! We are the good guys, remember?” permalink fedilink source parent [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -11 points 1 year ago (54 children) Is Turkey supporting the genocide? Iceland? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 54 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 18 points 1 year ago (53 children) Yes. Turkey provides Israel with 30% of their gas. Iceland has this guy running free https://lemmy.world/post/35387057 and they are super racist. And they are probably investing money in Israel if I look it up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 53 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -9 points 1 year ago (49 children) Other countries are trading with israel too, russia, China and many more, they are all complicit in aiding the israel war machine, so is it still "nato"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 49 child comments replies: [–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (38 children) Whatabout russia and china is monumental cope Why cant you admit that nato is responsible and should be held responsible the same way as any other entity that did not discontinue weapons transfers to israel after the siege began? Oh its american mic weapons? Okay, nato is an american defense pact. Why are you trying to dismiss culpability as if European nations dont actively support and enable the genocide in the exact same material capacity as america? Take your lumps. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -9 points 1 year ago (37 children) It literally isn't "monumental cope" Israel imports more from China than any other country, helping to fund what they do. I can't admit nato is responsible because it's not, nato is a defensive pact, the countries that are part of nato are the problem, not the organization, it is also not "an American defense pact", there are many countries involved. I literally said some European countries are responsible? But if you want to go to "NATO" being responsible it's clearly china's fault, because they allow the Israeli capitalism to flourish, allowing Aipac to bribe the Americans (see how fucking stupid that sounds?) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (9 children) nato is a defensive pact The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (7 children) These articles that disagree with me are clearly biased… against me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (15 children) NATO is not a defensive pact regardless of how much marketing campaigns (read: Western propaganda) is churned out. Look up what they did in Yugoslavia and Libya for good examples of their "defensiveness". Every single NATO country materially supports the settler-colony, regardless if they advertise it to be their genocide or not, no amount of "But china but russia but.." will change that. "Israel" is not a distinct state but an amalgamation of European (and more recently US and commonwealthian, whom hail from settler-colonies) settler-colonialist Zionazis occupying Palestine. Get that through your head. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (9 children) Tell that to Libya or the former Yugoslavia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (8 children) Right, cause if if was offensive it would be invading other countries to steal their territory right? Funny that's what russia claims NATO does, but they are doing it themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sounds like your just regurgitating pro nato propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Hell yeah I am!!!!! Anyways, what part of the "propaganda" is factually incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply) [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Fucking George Orwell. Good thing that Trump will abolish doublespeak and call the "Defence" department their real name. Hope he change the NATO pact too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The gop are all about double speak lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (8 children) No it only sounds stupid when you say that china allows Israeli capitalism to thrive. Getting hung up on the descriptor of nato countries being responsible for arming and funding the genocide is a deliberate obfuscation and refusal to acknowledge that these countries coordinate their military intelligence/technology and are connected through nato. Nato isnt like the UN where it's some separate body from the member states, the member states ARE nato. i/e nato is responsible for supplying israel with weapons = america, France, germany, Britain, turkey, etc are supplying israel with weapons. If russia, brazil, china, and iran were funding Israeli genocide we would be saying "brics is funding genocide in gaza" and you would unironically accept that framing even though brics is itself an economic pact whereas nato is explicitly a military defense pact. It is a descriptor, used because spelling out all 32 nato nations who are complicit is a waste of time when you can just say "nato is responsible for these weapons being used against palestinians" and it conveys the exact same meaning to anyone who isnt a pedant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) What a fucking baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (5 children) Yes, yes you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wow, you actually went with "I know you are, but what am I?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children) With the way you were acting, it was appropriate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago (9 children) In the Gaza genocide no. In the West Bank yes. You seem to avoid the point that these vehicle suicide bombs are 100% NATO funded and supplied. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (8 children) In both, the Gaza genocide and in the West Bank. These suice bombs aren't nato funded, just because the countries they originate from are some of natos members doesn't mean it's nato. Yes, the US Canada, England are funding the genocide, and providing equipment sure, but it's not NATO, Israel get funds it army through trade with hundreds of nations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 11 points 1 year ago* (7 children) NATO countries with "military export bans" are sending F35 parts and other weapons including interceptors to Israel through the NATO logistics program. They are using NATO ports and NATO logistics to send their NATO weapons. And purchasing Israeli designed weapons for their own NATO military after Israel is done testing them on Palestinians in Gaza. There is one overarching factor making this genocide possible: NATO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children) No they use their NATO logistics scheme to bypass military export bans and transport their weapons to America which then sends them to Israel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's the other way around, nato logistics is just military logistics that are shared across various countries, it's not nato, it's the countries themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children) The NATO countries? Yeah it is them. Using the NATO chain to supply Israel. They could of course stop being complicit in the NATO genocide of Gaza. But they refuse. Not sure what the point here is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [+] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -11 points 1 year ago* (2 children) You buy a gun from a store and ammo and then you kill someone, the arms company is responsable for your actions? Also dont mix up Amerikas actions with all of NATO permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes the arms company is responsible for selling you a gun when you are literally Adolf Hitler in the middle of the Holocaust. Also America and Europe are paying for the weapons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago Which company is giving knifes to serial killers? permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 year ago “Hell nah bro, it’s all a coincidence, they’re not doing it on purpose! We are the good guys, remember?” permalink fedilink source parent
[+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -11 points 1 year ago (54 children) Is Turkey supporting the genocide? Iceland? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 54 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 18 points 1 year ago (53 children) Yes. Turkey provides Israel with 30% of their gas. Iceland has this guy running free https://lemmy.world/post/35387057 and they are super racist. And they are probably investing money in Israel if I look it up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 53 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -9 points 1 year ago (49 children) Other countries are trading with israel too, russia, China and many more, they are all complicit in aiding the israel war machine, so is it still "nato"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 49 child comments replies: [–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (38 children) Whatabout russia and china is monumental cope Why cant you admit that nato is responsible and should be held responsible the same way as any other entity that did not discontinue weapons transfers to israel after the siege began? Oh its american mic weapons? Okay, nato is an american defense pact. Why are you trying to dismiss culpability as if European nations dont actively support and enable the genocide in the exact same material capacity as america? Take your lumps. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -9 points 1 year ago (37 children) It literally isn't "monumental cope" Israel imports more from China than any other country, helping to fund what they do. I can't admit nato is responsible because it's not, nato is a defensive pact, the countries that are part of nato are the problem, not the organization, it is also not "an American defense pact", there are many countries involved. I literally said some European countries are responsible? But if you want to go to "NATO" being responsible it's clearly china's fault, because they allow the Israeli capitalism to flourish, allowing Aipac to bribe the Americans (see how fucking stupid that sounds?) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (9 children) nato is a defensive pact The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (7 children) These articles that disagree with me are clearly biased… against me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (15 children) NATO is not a defensive pact regardless of how much marketing campaigns (read: Western propaganda) is churned out. Look up what they did in Yugoslavia and Libya for good examples of their "defensiveness". Every single NATO country materially supports the settler-colony, regardless if they advertise it to be their genocide or not, no amount of "But china but russia but.." will change that. "Israel" is not a distinct state but an amalgamation of European (and more recently US and commonwealthian, whom hail from settler-colonies) settler-colonialist Zionazis occupying Palestine. Get that through your head. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (9 children) Tell that to Libya or the former Yugoslavia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (8 children) Right, cause if if was offensive it would be invading other countries to steal their territory right? Funny that's what russia claims NATO does, but they are doing it themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sounds like your just regurgitating pro nato propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Hell yeah I am!!!!! Anyways, what part of the "propaganda" is factually incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply) [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Fucking George Orwell. Good thing that Trump will abolish doublespeak and call the "Defence" department their real name. Hope he change the NATO pact too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The gop are all about double speak lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (8 children) No it only sounds stupid when you say that china allows Israeli capitalism to thrive. Getting hung up on the descriptor of nato countries being responsible for arming and funding the genocide is a deliberate obfuscation and refusal to acknowledge that these countries coordinate their military intelligence/technology and are connected through nato. Nato isnt like the UN where it's some separate body from the member states, the member states ARE nato. i/e nato is responsible for supplying israel with weapons = america, France, germany, Britain, turkey, etc are supplying israel with weapons. If russia, brazil, china, and iran were funding Israeli genocide we would be saying "brics is funding genocide in gaza" and you would unironically accept that framing even though brics is itself an economic pact whereas nato is explicitly a military defense pact. It is a descriptor, used because spelling out all 32 nato nations who are complicit is a waste of time when you can just say "nato is responsible for these weapons being used against palestinians" and it conveys the exact same meaning to anyone who isnt a pedant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) What a fucking baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (5 children) Yes, yes you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wow, you actually went with "I know you are, but what am I?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children) With the way you were acting, it was appropriate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago (9 children) In the Gaza genocide no. In the West Bank yes. You seem to avoid the point that these vehicle suicide bombs are 100% NATO funded and supplied. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (8 children) In both, the Gaza genocide and in the West Bank. These suice bombs aren't nato funded, just because the countries they originate from are some of natos members doesn't mean it's nato. Yes, the US Canada, England are funding the genocide, and providing equipment sure, but it's not NATO, Israel get funds it army through trade with hundreds of nations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 11 points 1 year ago* (7 children) NATO countries with "military export bans" are sending F35 parts and other weapons including interceptors to Israel through the NATO logistics program. They are using NATO ports and NATO logistics to send their NATO weapons. And purchasing Israeli designed weapons for their own NATO military after Israel is done testing them on Palestinians in Gaza. There is one overarching factor making this genocide possible: NATO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children) No they use their NATO logistics scheme to bypass military export bans and transport their weapons to America which then sends them to Israel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's the other way around, nato logistics is just military logistics that are shared across various countries, it's not nato, it's the countries themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children) The NATO countries? Yeah it is them. Using the NATO chain to supply Israel. They could of course stop being complicit in the NATO genocide of Gaza. But they refuse. Not sure what the point here is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [+] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -11 points 1 year ago* (2 children) You buy a gun from a store and ammo and then you kill someone, the arms company is responsable for your actions? Also dont mix up Amerikas actions with all of NATO permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes the arms company is responsible for selling you a gun when you are literally Adolf Hitler in the middle of the Holocaust. Also America and Europe are paying for the weapons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago Which company is giving knifes to serial killers? permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 18 points 1 year ago (53 children) Yes. Turkey provides Israel with 30% of their gas. Iceland has this guy running free https://lemmy.world/post/35387057 and they are super racist. And they are probably investing money in Israel if I look it up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 53 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -9 points 1 year ago (49 children) Other countries are trading with israel too, russia, China and many more, they are all complicit in aiding the israel war machine, so is it still "nato"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 49 child comments replies: [–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (38 children) Whatabout russia and china is monumental cope Why cant you admit that nato is responsible and should be held responsible the same way as any other entity that did not discontinue weapons transfers to israel after the siege began? Oh its american mic weapons? Okay, nato is an american defense pact. Why are you trying to dismiss culpability as if European nations dont actively support and enable the genocide in the exact same material capacity as america? Take your lumps. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -9 points 1 year ago (37 children) It literally isn't "monumental cope" Israel imports more from China than any other country, helping to fund what they do. I can't admit nato is responsible because it's not, nato is a defensive pact, the countries that are part of nato are the problem, not the organization, it is also not "an American defense pact", there are many countries involved. I literally said some European countries are responsible? But if you want to go to "NATO" being responsible it's clearly china's fault, because they allow the Israeli capitalism to flourish, allowing Aipac to bribe the Americans (see how fucking stupid that sounds?) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (9 children) nato is a defensive pact The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (7 children) These articles that disagree with me are clearly biased… against me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (15 children) NATO is not a defensive pact regardless of how much marketing campaigns (read: Western propaganda) is churned out. Look up what they did in Yugoslavia and Libya for good examples of their "defensiveness". Every single NATO country materially supports the settler-colony, regardless if they advertise it to be their genocide or not, no amount of "But china but russia but.." will change that. "Israel" is not a distinct state but an amalgamation of European (and more recently US and commonwealthian, whom hail from settler-colonies) settler-colonialist Zionazis occupying Palestine. Get that through your head. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (9 children) Tell that to Libya or the former Yugoslavia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (8 children) Right, cause if if was offensive it would be invading other countries to steal their territory right? Funny that's what russia claims NATO does, but they are doing it themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sounds like your just regurgitating pro nato propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Hell yeah I am!!!!! Anyways, what part of the "propaganda" is factually incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply) [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Fucking George Orwell. Good thing that Trump will abolish doublespeak and call the "Defence" department their real name. Hope he change the NATO pact too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The gop are all about double speak lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (8 children) No it only sounds stupid when you say that china allows Israeli capitalism to thrive. Getting hung up on the descriptor of nato countries being responsible for arming and funding the genocide is a deliberate obfuscation and refusal to acknowledge that these countries coordinate their military intelligence/technology and are connected through nato. Nato isnt like the UN where it's some separate body from the member states, the member states ARE nato. i/e nato is responsible for supplying israel with weapons = america, France, germany, Britain, turkey, etc are supplying israel with weapons. If russia, brazil, china, and iran were funding Israeli genocide we would be saying "brics is funding genocide in gaza" and you would unironically accept that framing even though brics is itself an economic pact whereas nato is explicitly a military defense pact. It is a descriptor, used because spelling out all 32 nato nations who are complicit is a waste of time when you can just say "nato is responsible for these weapons being used against palestinians" and it conveys the exact same meaning to anyone who isnt a pedant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) What a fucking baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (5 children) Yes, yes you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wow, you actually went with "I know you are, but what am I?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children) With the way you were acting, it was appropriate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago (9 children) In the Gaza genocide no. In the West Bank yes. You seem to avoid the point that these vehicle suicide bombs are 100% NATO funded and supplied. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (8 children) In both, the Gaza genocide and in the West Bank. These suice bombs aren't nato funded, just because the countries they originate from are some of natos members doesn't mean it's nato. Yes, the US Canada, England are funding the genocide, and providing equipment sure, but it's not NATO, Israel get funds it army through trade with hundreds of nations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 11 points 1 year ago* (7 children) NATO countries with "military export bans" are sending F35 parts and other weapons including interceptors to Israel through the NATO logistics program. They are using NATO ports and NATO logistics to send their NATO weapons. And purchasing Israeli designed weapons for their own NATO military after Israel is done testing them on Palestinians in Gaza. There is one overarching factor making this genocide possible: NATO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children) No they use their NATO logistics scheme to bypass military export bans and transport their weapons to America which then sends them to Israel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's the other way around, nato logistics is just military logistics that are shared across various countries, it's not nato, it's the countries themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children) The NATO countries? Yeah it is them. Using the NATO chain to supply Israel. They could of course stop being complicit in the NATO genocide of Gaza. But they refuse. Not sure what the point here is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [+] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -11 points 1 year ago* (2 children) You buy a gun from a store and ammo and then you kill someone, the arms company is responsable for your actions? Also dont mix up Amerikas actions with all of NATO permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes the arms company is responsible for selling you a gun when you are literally Adolf Hitler in the middle of the Holocaust. Also America and Europe are paying for the weapons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago Which company is giving knifes to serial killers? permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -9 points 1 year ago (49 children) Other countries are trading with israel too, russia, China and many more, they are all complicit in aiding the israel war machine, so is it still "nato"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 49 child comments replies: [–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (38 children) Whatabout russia and china is monumental cope Why cant you admit that nato is responsible and should be held responsible the same way as any other entity that did not discontinue weapons transfers to israel after the siege began? Oh its american mic weapons? Okay, nato is an american defense pact. Why are you trying to dismiss culpability as if European nations dont actively support and enable the genocide in the exact same material capacity as america? Take your lumps. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -9 points 1 year ago (37 children) It literally isn't "monumental cope" Israel imports more from China than any other country, helping to fund what they do. I can't admit nato is responsible because it's not, nato is a defensive pact, the countries that are part of nato are the problem, not the organization, it is also not "an American defense pact", there are many countries involved. I literally said some European countries are responsible? But if you want to go to "NATO" being responsible it's clearly china's fault, because they allow the Israeli capitalism to flourish, allowing Aipac to bribe the Americans (see how fucking stupid that sounds?) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (9 children) nato is a defensive pact The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (7 children) These articles that disagree with me are clearly biased… against me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (15 children) NATO is not a defensive pact regardless of how much marketing campaigns (read: Western propaganda) is churned out. Look up what they did in Yugoslavia and Libya for good examples of their "defensiveness". Every single NATO country materially supports the settler-colony, regardless if they advertise it to be their genocide or not, no amount of "But china but russia but.." will change that. "Israel" is not a distinct state but an amalgamation of European (and more recently US and commonwealthian, whom hail from settler-colonies) settler-colonialist Zionazis occupying Palestine. Get that through your head. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (9 children) Tell that to Libya or the former Yugoslavia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (8 children) Right, cause if if was offensive it would be invading other countries to steal their territory right? Funny that's what russia claims NATO does, but they are doing it themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sounds like your just regurgitating pro nato propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Hell yeah I am!!!!! Anyways, what part of the "propaganda" is factually incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply) [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Fucking George Orwell. Good thing that Trump will abolish doublespeak and call the "Defence" department their real name. Hope he change the NATO pact too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The gop are all about double speak lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (8 children) No it only sounds stupid when you say that china allows Israeli capitalism to thrive. Getting hung up on the descriptor of nato countries being responsible for arming and funding the genocide is a deliberate obfuscation and refusal to acknowledge that these countries coordinate their military intelligence/technology and are connected through nato. Nato isnt like the UN where it's some separate body from the member states, the member states ARE nato. i/e nato is responsible for supplying israel with weapons = america, France, germany, Britain, turkey, etc are supplying israel with weapons. If russia, brazil, china, and iran were funding Israeli genocide we would be saying "brics is funding genocide in gaza" and you would unironically accept that framing even though brics is itself an economic pact whereas nato is explicitly a military defense pact. It is a descriptor, used because spelling out all 32 nato nations who are complicit is a waste of time when you can just say "nato is responsible for these weapons being used against palestinians" and it conveys the exact same meaning to anyone who isnt a pedant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) What a fucking baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (5 children) Yes, yes you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wow, you actually went with "I know you are, but what am I?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children) With the way you were acting, it was appropriate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago (9 children) In the Gaza genocide no. In the West Bank yes. You seem to avoid the point that these vehicle suicide bombs are 100% NATO funded and supplied. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (8 children) In both, the Gaza genocide and in the West Bank. These suice bombs aren't nato funded, just because the countries they originate from are some of natos members doesn't mean it's nato. Yes, the US Canada, England are funding the genocide, and providing equipment sure, but it's not NATO, Israel get funds it army through trade with hundreds of nations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 11 points 1 year ago* (7 children) NATO countries with "military export bans" are sending F35 parts and other weapons including interceptors to Israel through the NATO logistics program. They are using NATO ports and NATO logistics to send their NATO weapons. And purchasing Israeli designed weapons for their own NATO military after Israel is done testing them on Palestinians in Gaza. There is one overarching factor making this genocide possible: NATO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children) No they use their NATO logistics scheme to bypass military export bans and transport their weapons to America which then sends them to Israel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's the other way around, nato logistics is just military logistics that are shared across various countries, it's not nato, it's the countries themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children) The NATO countries? Yeah it is them. Using the NATO chain to supply Israel. They could of course stop being complicit in the NATO genocide of Gaza. But they refuse. Not sure what the point here is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (38 children) Whatabout russia and china is monumental cope Why cant you admit that nato is responsible and should be held responsible the same way as any other entity that did not discontinue weapons transfers to israel after the siege began? Oh its american mic weapons? Okay, nato is an american defense pact. Why are you trying to dismiss culpability as if European nations dont actively support and enable the genocide in the exact same material capacity as america? Take your lumps. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 38 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -9 points 1 year ago (37 children) It literally isn't "monumental cope" Israel imports more from China than any other country, helping to fund what they do. I can't admit nato is responsible because it's not, nato is a defensive pact, the countries that are part of nato are the problem, not the organization, it is also not "an American defense pact", there are many countries involved. I literally said some European countries are responsible? But if you want to go to "NATO" being responsible it's clearly china's fault, because they allow the Israeli capitalism to flourish, allowing Aipac to bribe the Americans (see how fucking stupid that sounds?) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (9 children) nato is a defensive pact The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (7 children) These articles that disagree with me are clearly biased… against me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (15 children) NATO is not a defensive pact regardless of how much marketing campaigns (read: Western propaganda) is churned out. Look up what they did in Yugoslavia and Libya for good examples of their "defensiveness". Every single NATO country materially supports the settler-colony, regardless if they advertise it to be their genocide or not, no amount of "But china but russia but.." will change that. "Israel" is not a distinct state but an amalgamation of European (and more recently US and commonwealthian, whom hail from settler-colonies) settler-colonialist Zionazis occupying Palestine. Get that through your head. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (9 children) Tell that to Libya or the former Yugoslavia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (8 children) Right, cause if if was offensive it would be invading other countries to steal their territory right? Funny that's what russia claims NATO does, but they are doing it themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sounds like your just regurgitating pro nato propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Hell yeah I am!!!!! Anyways, what part of the "propaganda" is factually incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply) [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Fucking George Orwell. Good thing that Trump will abolish doublespeak and call the "Defence" department their real name. Hope he change the NATO pact too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The gop are all about double speak lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (8 children) No it only sounds stupid when you say that china allows Israeli capitalism to thrive. Getting hung up on the descriptor of nato countries being responsible for arming and funding the genocide is a deliberate obfuscation and refusal to acknowledge that these countries coordinate their military intelligence/technology and are connected through nato. Nato isnt like the UN where it's some separate body from the member states, the member states ARE nato. i/e nato is responsible for supplying israel with weapons = america, France, germany, Britain, turkey, etc are supplying israel with weapons. If russia, brazil, china, and iran were funding Israeli genocide we would be saying "brics is funding genocide in gaza" and you would unironically accept that framing even though brics is itself an economic pact whereas nato is explicitly a military defense pact. It is a descriptor, used because spelling out all 32 nato nations who are complicit is a waste of time when you can just say "nato is responsible for these weapons being used against palestinians" and it conveys the exact same meaning to anyone who isnt a pedant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) What a fucking baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (5 children) Yes, yes you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wow, you actually went with "I know you are, but what am I?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children) With the way you were acting, it was appropriate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -9 points 1 year ago (37 children) It literally isn't "monumental cope" Israel imports more from China than any other country, helping to fund what they do. I can't admit nato is responsible because it's not, nato is a defensive pact, the countries that are part of nato are the problem, not the organization, it is also not "an American defense pact", there are many countries involved. I literally said some European countries are responsible? But if you want to go to "NATO" being responsible it's clearly china's fault, because they allow the Israeli capitalism to flourish, allowing Aipac to bribe the Americans (see how fucking stupid that sounds?) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (9 children) nato is a defensive pact The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (7 children) These articles that disagree with me are clearly biased… against me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (15 children) NATO is not a defensive pact regardless of how much marketing campaigns (read: Western propaganda) is churned out. Look up what they did in Yugoslavia and Libya for good examples of their "defensiveness". Every single NATO country materially supports the settler-colony, regardless if they advertise it to be their genocide or not, no amount of "But china but russia but.." will change that. "Israel" is not a distinct state but an amalgamation of European (and more recently US and commonwealthian, whom hail from settler-colonies) settler-colonialist Zionazis occupying Palestine. Get that through your head. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (9 children) Tell that to Libya or the former Yugoslavia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (8 children) Right, cause if if was offensive it would be invading other countries to steal their territory right? Funny that's what russia claims NATO does, but they are doing it themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sounds like your just regurgitating pro nato propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Hell yeah I am!!!!! Anyways, what part of the "propaganda" is factually incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply) [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Fucking George Orwell. Good thing that Trump will abolish doublespeak and call the "Defence" department their real name. Hope he change the NATO pact too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The gop are all about double speak lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (8 children) No it only sounds stupid when you say that china allows Israeli capitalism to thrive. Getting hung up on the descriptor of nato countries being responsible for arming and funding the genocide is a deliberate obfuscation and refusal to acknowledge that these countries coordinate their military intelligence/technology and are connected through nato. Nato isnt like the UN where it's some separate body from the member states, the member states ARE nato. i/e nato is responsible for supplying israel with weapons = america, France, germany, Britain, turkey, etc are supplying israel with weapons. If russia, brazil, china, and iran were funding Israeli genocide we would be saying "brics is funding genocide in gaza" and you would unironically accept that framing even though brics is itself an economic pact whereas nato is explicitly a military defense pact. It is a descriptor, used because spelling out all 32 nato nations who are complicit is a waste of time when you can just say "nato is responsible for these weapons being used against palestinians" and it conveys the exact same meaning to anyone who isnt a pedant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) What a fucking baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (5 children) Yes, yes you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wow, you actually went with "I know you are, but what am I?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children) With the way you were acting, it was appropriate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (9 children) nato is a defensive pact The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (7 children) These articles that disagree with me are clearly biased… against me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply)
[–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (7 children) These articles that disagree with me are clearly biased… against me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (7 children) These articles that disagree with me are clearly biased… against me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children) As if you’d actually read the articles. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it? Your media literacy could use improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) And when things are written factually there is less bias. How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago Not always lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (15 children) NATO is not a defensive pact regardless of how much marketing campaigns (read: Western propaganda) is churned out. Look up what they did in Yugoslavia and Libya for good examples of their "defensiveness". Every single NATO country materially supports the settler-colony, regardless if they advertise it to be their genocide or not, no amount of "But china but russia but.." will change that. "Israel" is not a distinct state but an amalgamation of European (and more recently US and commonwealthian, whom hail from settler-colonies) settler-colonialist Zionazis occupying Palestine. Get that through your head. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (9 children) Tell that to Libya or the former Yugoslavia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (8 children) Right, cause if if was offensive it would be invading other countries to steal their territory right? Funny that's what russia claims NATO does, but they are doing it themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sounds like your just regurgitating pro nato propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Hell yeah I am!!!!! Anyways, what part of the "propaganda" is factually incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply)
[–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (9 children) Tell that to Libya or the former Yugoslavia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (8 children) Right, cause if if was offensive it would be invading other countries to steal their territory right? Funny that's what russia claims NATO does, but they are doing it themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sounds like your just regurgitating pro nato propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Hell yeah I am!!!!! Anyways, what part of the "propaganda" is factually incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (9 children) Tell that to Libya or the former Yugoslavia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (8 children) Right, cause if if was offensive it would be invading other countries to steal their territory right? Funny that's what russia claims NATO does, but they are doing it themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (8 children) Right, cause if if was offensive it would be invading other countries to steal their territory right? Funny that's what russia claims NATO does, but they are doing it themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (7 children) The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) Right, and they invaded and took over those countries right? Cause that's what an offensive group would do permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Cause bombing civilians is what a defensive group would do. The NATO bombings of Libya & Yugoslavia still have nothing to do with Russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) If you’d read Parenti’s 2001 book, you’d know that that was bullshit pretext by the NATO powers. Yet more evidence has since come to light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have no doubt there is much more going on, but there are many conspiracies, I can't say it was a full on bullshit just based on this one guys take. If there was no intervention it would be what is happening now in Palestine. A genocide permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the CIA & MI6 hadn’t funded, trained, and armed Salafi Jihadi terrorists in Kosovo, there wouldn’t have been any deaths at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago I suspect there still would have been, but I'll admit that my knowledge of the conflict in that area is lacking, I will have to learn more about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sounds like your just regurgitating pro nato propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Hell yeah I am!!!!! Anyways, what part of the "propaganda" is factually incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Fucking George Orwell. Good thing that Trump will abolish doublespeak and call the "Defence" department their real name. Hope he change the NATO pact too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The gop are all about double speak lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The gop are all about double speak lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (8 children) No it only sounds stupid when you say that china allows Israeli capitalism to thrive. Getting hung up on the descriptor of nato countries being responsible for arming and funding the genocide is a deliberate obfuscation and refusal to acknowledge that these countries coordinate their military intelligence/technology and are connected through nato. Nato isnt like the UN where it's some separate body from the member states, the member states ARE nato. i/e nato is responsible for supplying israel with weapons = america, France, germany, Britain, turkey, etc are supplying israel with weapons. If russia, brazil, china, and iran were funding Israeli genocide we would be saying "brics is funding genocide in gaza" and you would unironically accept that framing even though brics is itself an economic pact whereas nato is explicitly a military defense pact. It is a descriptor, used because spelling out all 32 nato nations who are complicit is a waste of time when you can just say "nato is responsible for these weapons being used against palestinians" and it conveys the exact same meaning to anyone who isnt a pedant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) What a fucking baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (5 children) Yes, yes you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wow, you actually went with "I know you are, but what am I?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children) With the way you were acting, it was appropriate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) What a fucking baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (5 children) Yes, yes you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wow, you actually went with "I know you are, but what am I?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children) With the way you were acting, it was appropriate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) What a fucking baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (5 children) Yes, yes you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wow, you actually went with "I know you are, but what am I?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children) With the way you were acting, it was appropriate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (5 children) Yes, yes you are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wow, you actually went with "I know you are, but what am I?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children) With the way you were acting, it was appropriate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Wow, you actually went with "I know you are, but what am I?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children) With the way you were acting, it was appropriate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children) With the way you were acting, it was appropriate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) God, you really are a baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure thing skip. If it makes you feel better about yourself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Troll permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago (9 children) In the Gaza genocide no. In the West Bank yes. You seem to avoid the point that these vehicle suicide bombs are 100% NATO funded and supplied. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (8 children) In both, the Gaza genocide and in the West Bank. These suice bombs aren't nato funded, just because the countries they originate from are some of natos members doesn't mean it's nato. Yes, the US Canada, England are funding the genocide, and providing equipment sure, but it's not NATO, Israel get funds it army through trade with hundreds of nations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 11 points 1 year ago* (7 children) NATO countries with "military export bans" are sending F35 parts and other weapons including interceptors to Israel through the NATO logistics program. They are using NATO ports and NATO logistics to send their NATO weapons. And purchasing Israeli designed weapons for their own NATO military after Israel is done testing them on Palestinians in Gaza. There is one overarching factor making this genocide possible: NATO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children) No they use their NATO logistics scheme to bypass military export bans and transport their weapons to America which then sends them to Israel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's the other way around, nato logistics is just military logistics that are shared across various countries, it's not nato, it's the countries themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children) The NATO countries? Yeah it is them. Using the NATO chain to supply Israel. They could of course stop being complicit in the NATO genocide of Gaza. But they refuse. Not sure what the point here is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (8 children) In both, the Gaza genocide and in the West Bank. These suice bombs aren't nato funded, just because the countries they originate from are some of natos members doesn't mean it's nato. Yes, the US Canada, England are funding the genocide, and providing equipment sure, but it's not NATO, Israel get funds it army through trade with hundreds of nations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 11 points 1 year ago* (7 children) NATO countries with "military export bans" are sending F35 parts and other weapons including interceptors to Israel through the NATO logistics program. They are using NATO ports and NATO logistics to send their NATO weapons. And purchasing Israeli designed weapons for their own NATO military after Israel is done testing them on Palestinians in Gaza. There is one overarching factor making this genocide possible: NATO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children) No they use their NATO logistics scheme to bypass military export bans and transport their weapons to America which then sends them to Israel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's the other way around, nato logistics is just military logistics that are shared across various countries, it's not nato, it's the countries themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children) The NATO countries? Yeah it is them. Using the NATO chain to supply Israel. They could of course stop being complicit in the NATO genocide of Gaza. But they refuse. Not sure what the point here is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 11 points 1 year ago* (7 children) NATO countries with "military export bans" are sending F35 parts and other weapons including interceptors to Israel through the NATO logistics program. They are using NATO ports and NATO logistics to send their NATO weapons. And purchasing Israeli designed weapons for their own NATO military after Israel is done testing them on Palestinians in Gaza. There is one overarching factor making this genocide possible: NATO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children) No they use their NATO logistics scheme to bypass military export bans and transport their weapons to America which then sends them to Israel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's the other way around, nato logistics is just military logistics that are shared across various countries, it's not nato, it's the countries themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children) The NATO countries? Yeah it is them. Using the NATO chain to supply Israel. They could of course stop being complicit in the NATO genocide of Gaza. But they refuse. Not sure what the point here is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children) No they use their NATO logistics scheme to bypass military export bans and transport their weapons to America which then sends them to Israel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's the other way around, nato logistics is just military logistics that are shared across various countries, it's not nato, it's the countries themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children) The NATO countries? Yeah it is them. Using the NATO chain to supply Israel. They could of course stop being complicit in the NATO genocide of Gaza. But they refuse. Not sure what the point here is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children) No they use their NATO logistics scheme to bypass military export bans and transport their weapons to America which then sends them to Israel. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's the other way around, nato logistics is just military logistics that are shared across various countries, it's not nato, it's the countries themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children) The NATO countries? Yeah it is them. Using the NATO chain to supply Israel. They could of course stop being complicit in the NATO genocide of Gaza. But they refuse. Not sure what the point here is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent
[+] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's the other way around, nato logistics is just military logistics that are shared across various countries, it's not nato, it's the countries themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children) The NATO countries? Yeah it is them. Using the NATO chain to supply Israel. They could of course stop being complicit in the NATO genocide of Gaza. But they refuse. Not sure what the point here is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children) The NATO countries? Yeah it is them. Using the NATO chain to supply Israel. They could of course stop being complicit in the NATO genocide of Gaza. But they refuse. Not sure what the point here is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The point is, it's not "NATO", that being said, I don't think this is going anywhere. We all agree there is a genocide, and it must be stopped. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wait a minute hold up Who made these APC which are exploding in the video and made the explosives which are put in the APC and then sent them to Israel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago The American MIC permalink fedilink source parent
[+] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -11 points 1 year ago* (2 children) You buy a gun from a store and ammo and then you kill someone, the arms company is responsable for your actions? Also dont mix up Amerikas actions with all of NATO permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes the arms company is responsible for selling you a gun when you are literally Adolf Hitler in the middle of the Holocaust. Also America and Europe are paying for the weapons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago Which company is giving knifes to serial killers? permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes the arms company is responsible for selling you a gun when you are literally Adolf Hitler in the middle of the Holocaust. Also America and Europe are paying for the weapons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago Which company is giving knifes to serial killers? permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago Which company is giving knifes to serial killers? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 1 year ago Which company is giving knifes to serial killers? permalink fedilink source parent