you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it's easy to tell the bias.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
    1. As if you’d actually read the articles.
    2. And when it isn’t written that way, it’s harder to tell the bias. When the NYT “neutralizes” language regarding the Palestinian genocide, is it removing its bias or obscuring it?
    3. Your media literacy could use improvement.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I'm not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments