Following up on this comment since I haven't seen a thread about it: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/14639216

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

7/10 to me is a good game. I hate how people rate games. I’ve always hated it. A 6/10 game is enjoyable. A 5/10 game is absolutely mid. A 4/10 game is okay. 3/10 has huge flaws but is worth playing if you’re into that.

Subnautica is an 8/10 game for me. I thought it was amazing. I loved it. Below Zero was a 6/10 game. I thought it was good. I enjoyed it, and I would not call it “absolute mid.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    In a world where games are scored across a full spectrum 0-or-1 to 10, then yes - anything 4-6 would be considered middle of the road.

    However, due to a number of factors - that’s unfortunately not the reality we find ourselves in.

    Firstly, “mid” is hard to define as it can mean anything from ‘mediocre’ to ‘fine, but forgettable’.

    Secondly, ratings/scores tend to skew upward as people tend to reserve 1s for outright scams, broken games and review bombs. With 2 & 3 often used for ‘asset flips’ and similar non-games - so we end up grading on a curve from 4-10.

    This also works well for mainstream outlets as it keeps advertisers happy, due to arbitrarily inflated scores.

    Lastly, in a world of cumulative media (new releases don’t cause older ones to stop existing) - even ostensibly good games will fall by the wayside as players have access to 10/10 titles from previous years.

    So all things considered, a 7/10 is well and truly “mid” in this topsy-turvey IGN-eque world

  • source
  • parent