[–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

9 times out of 10 it's a Nvidia driver problem or hardware problem. Occasionally someone might get a update which is only partly on the server they update from due to timing, but again normally corrected by updating again.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    I commit the cardinal sin of using an AUR helper when I use EndeavourOS

    I don't think it's a sin to use an AUR helper such as yay at all (me too BTW). The sin is, not to read the AUR scripts or to trust random sources in the script.

    As for your main question, I am not aware of a user repository in the style of AUR for Debian. Maybe you could use NIX package system, that you can install on any OS that is not read only. Or as others suggested, maybe Distrobox and then use AUR directly. But these are only workarounds, not a clean solution.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    My favorite thing about CachyOS/Arch is how it stops me from footgunning myself.

    Okay, I need to make some weird manual tweak… oh look, they’ve already done it and are maintaining it for me.

    Package issue? Oh, they’ve already updated it; that was easy.

    AUR can of worms? Nope. They’ve already added what I wanted in the main repos. Same with Flatpak stuff.

    And my brief adventures with an immutable and “slow” OSes led to further breakage when I needed to fix something esoteric, but Arch is configured to make applying fixes quite easy, and well documented.


    My info on other distros is a bit dated though.

    I do agree with the articles assessment. I’d probably recommend Bazzite over CachyOS to someone who won’t do any maintenance.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Yeah, it's clear that partial update is not something you want, and sometimes it stops working until restart, indeed

    I guess, you can argue that repository maintainers and distro maintainers are different people, but I feel like it still counts as you can't go on without updates

    But I'm fine with that, it didn't break for me yet :)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago*

    Ah, OK. There's no marketplace for self-made Debian packages that I know of, but of course it's still possible to make them, even create your own repositories and add them to your apt. And in good old Debian fashion it's going to be way more low-level, and confusing to find definite documentation. One thing I'm seeing again and again is dpkg-deb and other dpkg-* commands.

    https://debian-handbook.info/browse/stable/debian-packaging.html
    https://dario.griffo.io/posts/ultimate-guide-debian-packaging/
    https://www.baeldung.com/linux/create-debian-package

    Pity makedeb is unmaintained. But maybe still usable?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    What do you want?

    I want an AUR, but for Debian. Same thing, PKGBUILDS included, but targeting apt instead of pacman, and Debian's packages instead of Arch's. I feel like it would work well since Debian has a stable base, so it'd be easy to build packages against it.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Definitely, I have run into that many times, indeed. I guess most(?) package mirrors will only keep the current version available for download, or at most two or something?

    At that point, it is good to upgrade the system. Installing a new package in that way, without syncing the rest of the system, I suppose essentially and technically counts as a "partial upgrade" which is not supported.

    That's a separate thing from "maintenance" though, and an intrinsic behavior of the combined package manager and mirror systems. And also something you can have mixed feelings about. 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    You can run without updates, but sometimes you will not be able to install a new package because dependencies will return Not Found

    I think, it's by design, to not maintain a ton of stale dependencies, but maybe I'm doing it wrong, don't know

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago*

    Yeah, it doesn't look like they ever donated directly to Omarchy. Not to say their association with DHH (the racist bigot at the helm of Omarchy) has never involved money though, as they listed a sizable sponsorship with Rails World, which platforms DHH. That said, it doesn't look like they've done any other sponsorships with Rails World since.

    I went to check on whether they were still sponsoring Hyprland, a project which fosters a notoriously hateful community, and it looks like they've stopped their €600/month commitment and now instead report a lump sum of €7200, which could indicate that they stopped sponsoring them after 12 months. Too long IMO, but maybe there was some sort of contract involved that made it difficult for them to pull out. In any case, it's good to see they appear to have cancelled those gross affiliations.

    I still hold reservations, as I'm not familiar with who is behind many of the other projects they're sponsoring. Given their failure to identify how problematic associations with DHH and Hyprland were, it leaves questions about whether they'll ensure their due diligence on sponsorships going forwards, (or worse, that they knew and didn't care until the community's uproar). I'm hopeful, but wary.

    Maybe by the time I'm looking for a new laptop, I can consider framework.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›