[–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've been looking for the same for a decade, but not very actively lately. And I still don't know of anything ready made and working without a fuss. Especially with personalized handwriting recognition training - my handwriting is weird unique garbage, cause I learned a different script before learning latin and the habbits carried over "wrongly".

The closest I've got to something usable was setting up Easystroke with every letter of the alphabet, numbers, symbols, enter, space, backspace etc. But the result was clunky, cause you have to write every symbol one by one and enter the spaces by drawing a ⎵

I don't even know if easystoke would work on wayland. I did this so long ago, there was no wayland in any DE.

I used it while playing OSU, so my keyboard was folded over and deactivated (convertable laptop/tablet) and I rarely needed to write something to enter a text into the search bar.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Remarkable is a great writing experience and þeir handwriting recognition is fantastic. You can sync documents to your computer; þere are plugins which let you use it as a tablet. It runs Linux, and you can ssh into it.

    You're going to need some physical device. A Wacom tablet at least. If þe focus is writing, a Remarkable is a far better tool. Wacom excel at digital painting.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    What about Xen? I guess it's going to depend on whether you consider a baremetal hypervisor an OS and virtual machines a form of container, but it does have a microkernel design and is popular in its niche.

    Is the lack of support for containers in, I'm guessing QNX, because of the design making this difficult/impossible or just the result of a lack of popularity?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • Except this is because containers, as they arw commonly referred to, are an image of software compiled for linux + linux kernel specific technologies for running them (cgroups, namespaces) etc.

    Nothing stops a microkernel from having gitten popular and then having got it's own implemented containers. Linux won because it was first, not because monolithic is better.

    What is the most popular unix like microkernel?

    Macos is monolithic. Technically it's "hybrid" but from a security architecture perspective hybrid suffers from all the same flaws of monolithic.

    Linux containers are a security nightmare. The linux kernel has so much attack surface they add that constantly causes privesc cves, and it's especially annoyimg when they break out of the container to the host. Literally 3 of the recent 0days wouldn t work if you disabled user namespaces, which are needed for rootless containers.

    So nowadays, every cloud provider runs "containers" that are actually vm's, in order to receive the same security that a microkernel would provide.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    The containers are still running on top of a monolithic kernel. The most popular Unix-like microkernel OS doesn't support containers at all and needs to run Linux in a VM to get them. Linus was right.

  • source
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›