As you mention, use a small fan filter to draw away the fumes. If you can smell the flux vapors, you don't have enough ventilation (although most people won't care). Unless you do long sessions I rarely see people wearing masks or gloves but if you are confortable doing so then yes that's a good idea.

One thing is glasses. Especially when inexperienced, it can happen that you can fling around small solder blobs by accident. You don't want that in your eyes.

I would suggest not avoiding flux. It's basically easy mode compared to without. Even if you use flux core solder.

Si c'est pour dequoi de technique ou décisionnel, e.g. avec un collègue, rester poli mais refuser d'engager avec la réponse générée marche relativement bien pour passer le message.

"C'est aussi ce que l'AI m'a répondu, mais je voulais ton opinion ?"

Si quelqu'un s'aide de LLM pour une conversation sociale, pas autant facile.

That would be my guess as well.

I'm not a researcher in this field, so I don't have anything substantial to suggest. My opinion is that it is unsolvable.

No matter what you try, sufficiently powerful entities will be able to modify the sensor to sign images of anything they want to pass as real (or just use a very high quality projector)

It might be better that we are all always weary of an image being AI at this point.

This is a terrible idea. So of course it already exists https://c2pa.org/

It's already being exploited https://www.da.vidbuchanan.co.uk/blog/android-c2pa.html

We need a solution but that's not it.

electrons actually loop around in a closed DC circuit in the speed of light

On average, electrons "move forward" much much slower than that:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drift_velocity

But even the whole "electrical signal" is slower than the speed of light:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity_factor#Typical_velocity_factors

I've had to edit typst recently and I used

https://codeberg.org/meow_king/typst-ts-mode

And the LSP: https://github.com/Myriad-Dreamin/tinymist

Specifically for doom, you'd add typst-ts-mode in your packages.el in a package! entry and check either eglot or lsp-mode doc for how to configure the LSP.

Not how I understand it, but I'm not a lawyer. The user that uses the script to generate the code can copyright the output and oop can copyright their script (and the output they themself generate). If it worked like you said, it would be trivial to write a script that generates all possible code by enumerating possible programs, then because the script will eventually generate your code, it's already copyrighted. This appear absurd to me.

Relevant: https://www.vice.com/en/article/musicians-algorithmically-generate-every-possible-melody-release-them-to-public-domain/

If the script copies chunks of code under the copyright of the original script writer, I typically see for those parts that the original owner keeps copyright of those chunks and usually license it in some way to the user. But the code from the user input part is still copyrightable by the user. And that's that last part that is most interesting for the copyright of AI works. I'm curious how the law will settle on that.

I'm open to counterarguments.

Maybe with Xpra you could do something like that

Corner color for iff, memory for if

Colors in pairs, all yellow are the same and all red are opposite, and so on (all blues the same blue-all orange opposite, etc.)

I only add the color if it encodes completely one or more rule so I can dim them.