Why would anyone want something that provides the olfactory promise of bacon, but never delivers actual bacon?

I can imagine accounting companies that get brought in as business consultants, then use the opening to upsell technical solutions.

She doesn't spend the cash. It's her ID card.

In Westminster-like systems, I believe this would be loss of supply, where it's expected to trigger an election. It seems to work well as an incentive for governments to do their bloody job, but I'm sure they would find a way to abuse or ignore it.

Now I want to know why Sabaton hasn't done a song about the Emu War.

Because you already switched, right? Right!?

Yeah, those trotters couldn't possibly wield a cleaver safely.

It's not all Australians, but those who do it are all over social media for some reason.

I've been rolling up my clothes for years. I thought it would leave wrinkles, but it doesn't. So much faster than folding, and much easier to pack when travelling.

I'm going to guess, based on the pattern of other misuses, they use it like "ultimate", but with emphasis?

I think strong/static typing with inference is the sweet spot. Complex types can change, so it helps to at least have your boundaries well defined. Within the scope of a function, if you need explicit typing on everything then your function might be getting too complex.

Or just the size of the largest input?