Personally I love oranges but cant stand orange juice.

top 92 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 110 points 1 year ago (45 children)

Decimate means 1/10th destroyed, lost, whatever. I don't care that the dictionary says that meaning is obsolete. I get that the meaning of words changes over time, but it has the prefix deci. 1/10th. You don't get to decide something that starts with 1/10th means near total even if it's a scary sounding word.

This is my anthill and I'm dying here.

  • source
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Does English have sufficiently scary words that are also etymologically correct?

    A population being halvsied just doesn't hit the same, you know?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Penultimate must send you into spasms as well

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I didn't even know it had an alternate or wrong meaning

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Meanwhile I hear it used correctly maybe 5% of the time

    Seems like we all have different experiences with this word

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Do we have any other words where adding the prefix "pen" to it means "next to"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Pen is more like "almost", like in peninsula, almost an island.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Don’t start, the other lemming just taught us it’s almost an isle; island is a completely different unrelated word that they shoved an s in by mistake

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I have so many like that one. At some point in English one billion dropped its value three orders of magnitude and it is spreading to other languages. What now is called a billion it was one thousand million or a milliard.

    More recently, one dude used the word hallucination for what AI do and everyone ran with it, there was already a word to describe that phenomenon, fabulation. Hallucination means something completely different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So we get to hundred, then thousand up to hundred thousand, why would we use a thousand thousand for a million, or ten hundred thousand, or a hundred thousand thousand? A new word at each separator just makes easy parsing.

    One hundred seventy three thousand million four hundred sixty two thousand four hundred twenty just sounds so much worse and harder to parser when hearing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    My biggest gripe about it is that it should mean sacrificing a tenth (or a small portion) in order to preserve the whole.

    So many words that mean completely destroy, and we have to make the one meaning specifically not that to also mean completely destroy. The language is weaker for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I always interpreted it as "break into ten pieces"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It comes from the Latin "decimatio", a form of Roman military punishment where every tenth man had to be executed by his mates.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "You did poorly, as punishment we'll take away 10% of your capability" seems counterproductive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    From what I've read it was used to punish things like cowardice or mutiny.

    It was super brutal, they were divided in groups of ten people, draw straws and had to execute themselves the one with the short straw using clubs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    My personal gripe in this area is people misusing "objectively".

    Such as declaring that a certain movie or game is objectively good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    If an art work has been popular for years, has won dozens of awards, is used by experts as an example of excellence, isn't it 'objectively' good?

    I understand your point, that a person might not like a particular movie or game and therefore think it's 'not good.'

    I'm saying that even when you're talking about a subjective experience there are criteria that a disinterested party can rate and successful or unsuccessful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

    If an art work has been popular for years, has won dozens of awards, is used by experts as an example of excellence, isn’t it ‘objectively’ good?

    If I don't like that piece of art, am I wrong? Am I objectively incorrect of the opinions inside my own head?

    Lots of people dislike award winning movies, songs, and games. Are those people measurably wrong? No. The plural of subjective opinions is not an objective one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    You can dislike something, and still appreciate its merits.

    Say I get a bowl of broccoli soup. Is the bowl clean? Is the soup the right temperature? Was it made with wholesome ingredients? I may not want it because I don't like broccoli, but I wouldn't tell someone else not to try it.

    Objectively, it's a good bowl of soup.

    See?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If a piece of art was created 100 years ago and every professional critic of the time thought it was trash without any merit, and then 100 years later the critical reception of that same piece had changed and it was considered a piece of high art, is that piece of art objectively good? Objectively bad? Was it objectively bad 100 years ago and then somehow became good?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Good point.

    But, unless you're talking about a hypothetical situation where the art was hidden away and rediscovered, the work must have had some merit or it wouldn't have lasted 100 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    If an art work has been popular for years, has won dozens of awards, is used by experts as an example of excellence, isn’t it ‘objectively’ good?

    In this earlier definition looking for objective merit, it leans heavily on professional opinion. If a small number of individuals not thinking a work that is "objectively good" is good doesn't change that, then the opposite must also be true. Therefore, if we have a situation where the critical consensus is that a work is bad, and only a small number of people think it is good, then we have a piece of art that is "objectively bad" by using the critical standards, but which is held onto by a small number of people who disagree.

    At the top of this discussion I didn't define "art" merely as visual pieces (I actually used examples of movie and games). So that art could be anything expressive- music, books, plays, movies, games, and beyond. I can think of art and artists not appreciated in their time, and then over time critical perception turned around.

    This is all a long way of saying critical opinions are at the end of the day still opinions. That's why even critics disagree with each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I feel like when it comes to judging an artwork, saying that something is objectively good does actually mean "for the majority", because there is no singular point of absolute goodness to compare it to.

    So even if there's a little leeway in the definition of "objectively" that doesn't necessarily mean that the statement is wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    "Road Works" usually means it doesn't.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The "End Construction" signs you sometimes see on the side of the road aren't actually protesting growth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    For years, growing up, there were signs saying "adopt a view point" in the highway we'd drive out to see family over the holidays.

    For years, I thought they were saying something about road saftey, warning drivers to look at whats coming up instead of directly in front of them. Something akin to the picking a spot on the horizon to sail towards to keep the boat straight my dad had taught me for sailing...

    At some point i realized the blue signs were all guidance or info, not rules or warning. At one point I thought they might be politically motivated, like the "please dont litter" signs along that same highway- where they pleading with us to form and opinion, any opinion.

    I think I was in my late teens before I finally saw one that said "this viewpoint adopted by " and realized they were literally asking people to sponsor the scenic pull-off spots along the highway.

    I still prefer to read them as some poor civil servant waging a private campaign against nihilism, picking the nicest bits of scenery for his message, hoping to shock the american public out of their unfeeling malaise.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

    Probably stereotypical, but I find well done steaks to be a total waste.

    I rarely cook steak, but when I do I go to a butcher and get something quality and fresh. Normally I don't care how other people enjoy their food, but when I take the effort to get quality steak and someone at a family get together asks me to cook until the steak is grey in the center it just deflates me. Logically I know that if everyone is happy with their food it doesn't matter, but personally having to mangle a steak so it has the taste of ground beef just goes against every cooking instinct I have.

    I've learned that when certain people are coming to a holiday cookout to just cook burgers or BBQ instead. Everyone is just as happy with what they get.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    I consider myself openminded and tolerant.

    I once heard a fellow say he was from Minnesota and he thought ketchup was too spicy.

    Outwardly I stayed calm but in my heart I wanted to burn the heretic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I'm in Minnesota, and I can confirm there are people who think ketchup is spicy.

    The first time I encountered "ketchup is spicy/a hot sauce," I thought it was a joke. Then I also learned that there are truly bland people who think salt and pepper is "too much".

    I live in a very weird state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I've known a few midwesterners like that, they likely grew up on "natural flavor" and never add anything to their food and eat the blandest possible interpretations of real foods, and since their taste buds aren't used to any real flavor anything cooked with flavor is extreme to them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What leads to this… genuinely curious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    If you go back far enough, there’s a lot of Scandinavian heritage in Minnesota settlers, especially Sweden and Norway. Historically, Scandinavian foods lacked spice because there weren’t a lot of spices that grew there. The settlers brought the palette that comes with that with them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I grew up eating what most people consider very spicy food. I don't care what level of spicy other people are comfortable with, but I've found that amongst certain types of people I have to be discreet about my preference for spicy food. Some people find it a novelty to gawk at which is just awkward.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I fairly recently moved to Minnesota and I love very spicy foods. I just have to accept the fact that everything people here tell me is spicy is going to be very tame. People that get to know me have started saying "really spicy... for Minnesota" lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I don't eat meat at all anymore, but growing up, whenever we had steaks I would always prefer it well done. It wasn't really that I enjoyed it that way though, just that I did not like the flavor and texture of steak even cooked perfectly, my father did and kept making me eat it, and cooking it to a crisp and then covering it with ketchup and paprika was a way to make it not taste like steak anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

    People rip on US electricity standards all the time, from voltage, via frequency, to the NEMA plugs, and for good reasons. But the most disgusting thing about it all is this:

    US breaker panels are fugly. Sure, they work just as well as those from the rest of the world, but they're aesthetically displeasing.

    Two representative pictures I found of an average panel just now;

    US:

    EU:

    Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • Yep I've held electrical qualifications for over twenty years and have some of the most stringent qualifications in the world, and the US shit is a joke

    The worst thing is that people think it's safer because of the shitty low voltage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Is that EU picture supposed to look more aesthetically appealing than the US one? Because I flip a switch on the US panel and feel super serious, like Kurt Russell about to flip the switch on all power on Earth. I look at the EU picture and think of the electrical outlets behind the teacher’s desk in the 80 year old school building I attended.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    wait, how do you route cables in there? is there just a massive bundle right through the middle?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I'm Australian, but some of the older switchboards in industrial installations are similar in appearance to the top image.

    The middle would have a busbar (or three if it's a three phase panel) that connects the circuit breakers to the main switch. The cables are connected to the far left and far right sides of the breakers.

    It could be different in the US, though, if anyone with more relevant experience wants to chime in.

    Edit: looking back at the top image, I'm reminded that the US uses split phase in some places, so that top panel likely has two busbars down the middle.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Varies with installation type, age, and scale, but one common approach is to daisy chain the breakers via rails that carry each phase. I couldn't find a good picture, but basically the rails and breakers are standardized so that a row of breakers will line up with the-rail terminals, so when you connect the rail to the mains you're good to go. On the output of the breaker it's common to use cable ducts to keep everything nice and tidy.

    EDIT: Found a picture:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    american version would probably only have two phases at best, and possibly just one

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Every building receives 240V and splits it into a pair of 120V phases. Three phase power is basically only installed at large industrial sites or very specialized shops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    here if you need anything over certain power (6kW; depends on country i guess) you need a three phase installation, and even if you get single phase, it's really handled as three phase split between single phase customers (a block gets three phase supply, then splits flats in three groups, each group gets connected to one phase). this gets supplied by a distribution transformer that might serve somewhere around 200 people per (in residential areas)

    i understand that sometimes americans also get distribution like this, with 208/120 three phase coming from substation, without 240v available

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Why is everything sideways in the American one? From the numbers on the switches to the warning labels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    2 big reasons for that:

    1. Fits better between studs as the other commenter stated
    2. Easier and cleaner to route the 2 power phases. US plugs are famously ~120V but what many don't realize is that's a single phase of 120V, and there's two phases that go into the breaker box. By combining the +120VAC and -120VAC phases you get a full 240VAC for higher power appliances like stoves, dryers, heat pumps and electric vehicles.
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    There should be more mature games.

    I don't mean like sex games, I mean like games intended for adults that can have mature content and mature stories without it being heavily watered down.

    Games should have as much leeway as the film or book industry when it comes to mature content - Though I guess that's getting murky too lately.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    A great example of this is Halo.

    The Flood is a horrible body horror parasite that transforms your body and invades and consumes your mind, your thoughts and your memories. It's corruption based on revenge of the Precursors for the Forerunner's war against them out of petty anger. The original trilogy shows this off well, and acts like a horror game when you're getting swarmed from all angles by them.

    343 era games are like "bad guys are robots, Flood too scary and gorey we removed them." All for that lower Teen rating just to sell more copies to a broader audience. They remove the bloodiness and the gore. Hell, you could make a lake of Covenant and human blood in CE. Now you might get a couple splashes of blood to not tip that ESRB scale.

    Pathetically watered down in many other aspects, but this was one that always bothered me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›