MLK & Malcolm X style

Your first link is about how voters want them to defeat maga.

The second link is an organization I don't know endorsing(?) a person I don't recognize with 0 context clues of what that means.

The third link is paywalled.

What collaboration are you pointing to? Because I don't see what you're talking about.

What in those links are you pointing to? As far as I can tell they don't seem terribly relevant to your point, but maybe I'm missing something

If there's nothing missable or I already know I'm going to replay it, I tend to go in blind and look up info as I need it.

Souls games don't fall into that category, though, so I like to use those progress checklists, which I prefer to the full walkthroughs. There's just enough info that I don't miss quests or go to harder areas than I'm ready for, but not so much that I feel like I'm being told how to play. Elden ring has a really good spreadsheet for that, and the other souls games have decent pages on their wikis.

The one thing I use guides heavily for, though, is builds. I'll usually look up weapon locations and stat reqs in order to plan out a build that leaves me room to experiment with different types of combat through the early/midgame and then specialize when I decide what I want to use long-term

Tarnished gets immediately sidetracked trying to fight the tree sentinel on foot. They spend the rest of the movie respawning and trying again. They never beat it.

Calling apathetic people shitty is a right, too.

(Also, apathy is a privilege. I wish my personal safety wasn't on the ballot and I could afford my own high horse)

My position on what? Politics is a mess of interconnected pieces. I'm an anarchist and I distrust states, especially ones that have proven themselves untrustworthy. I agree that tearing down one superpower risks a huge and awful domino effect, but i dont have the depth of global politics knowledge to come up with some kind of large scale plan - and even if i did, then what? What would my plan matter without any support from basically anyone.

You act like me pointing out why people think you insulted them somehow means my priority is opposing China. What I oppose (in this instance! Because it seemed to be what you were implying!) is people who believe China can do no wrong because they oppose the USA. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" only works on a temporary and situational basis with a large amount of skepticism.

When did I say China needs to be split up? Who are you having an argument with?

Can you point to where I called them equal?

And I'll just say this again:

You don't have to be on the side of one state to oppose another state.

Yessss. Auriza was the one i was thinking of, but leyndell was also great. I dont think i made it all the way to the mountaintops one, though (I should open the game back up at some point)

Your problem is that your insult is not directed at anything specific, so it's easy to assume it's at this community as a whole. Your jargon also identifies you as a probable tankie, and when tankies say "western chauvinism" they usually mean "not gargling china's boot".

Western chauvinism is bad and should be called out, but it shouldn't be replaced with eastern chauvinism. You don't have to be on the side of one state to oppose another state.

Also the ER dungeons are hand-crafted and build on each other, in some cases relying on your familiarity with the tileset. One of my favorite experiences in ER was the dungeon that warped you between two copies of the same map in order to disoriented you.