It’s getting about time for me to ban the entire .world instance. They’d rather uphold their civility laws than do what’s necessary to purge these little fucking shitheels from their system.

They don’t even know these assholes do this on purpose to silence anyone that disagrees with their dumb shit.

Apparently “Rule 3” is Politics’ interpretation of .ml’s “Rule 1”: a catch all used for when the mods don’t like what you say- regardless of it not violating a single rule.

What about this comment broke a rule? Because to me, it seems Politics is capitulating to the non-voters. Maybe .ml is paying their bills, who knows…

This is what was too hostile for those assholes

all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    No need to be mean tbh, it won't lead to people changing their mind but rather bunker down on their ideas.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    There was nothing mean about it. They were acting as if we’re in some movie plot. Typical non-voter slop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Your tone was condescending. Their rule 3 asks to be civil. They seem to be in the right on this, though power abuse is otherwise an issue on .world. Not sure how any of this relates to MoG though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    You're cringe as fuck dude. You go into their instance and start insulting people and then wonder why you're banned?

    Essentially, you're upset that people are expressing a different opinion than yours, and then you throw a tantrum when they're not banned for having a different opinion than yours.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

    Point out the insult. I’ll wait here. Oh, and… the irony of you insulting me while admonishing me for insulting people.

    Redditor I presume?

    Also, I didn’t say shit about them not being banned. I simply question where I broke a rule. Considering the chodes I was responding to, I was being civil as…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago*

    the irony of you insulting me while admonishing me for insulting people.

    I'm not insulting you. I'm describing your behavior.

    Also, I didn’t say shit about them not being banned.

    Are you sure?

    They’d rather uphold their civility laws than do what’s necessary to purge these little fucking shitheels from their system.

    To the layman, you calling for a "purge" here would be interpreted as you wanting them banned. But I'm sure the expert have another explanation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    I wonder why you didn't want to use this comment in your little post about how you're so unfairly banned.

    Or this one for that matter

    Seriously, throwing tantrums like a child because others don't share your opinions. Good riddance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] -6 points 1 week ago*

    You call that throwing tantrums? ROFL! I didn’t include those because I screenshot on a phone and they clipped out. But thanks for helping me to prove my point.

    Gonna block your annoying ass now. You just seem to want to argue. Good riddance indeed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    Apathy is a right, you cannot expect or demand someone cares about a given cause.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Apathy isn’t a right, it’s a state of being. And nothing was demanded of anyone here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments